The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lab-on-valve: universal microflow analyzer based on sequential and bead injection
Abstract
This paper introduces a novel methodology for downscaling reagent based assays to micro- and submicroliter level. It is shown that sample handling in the sequential injection mode, which employs forward, reversed and stopped flow, can be programmed to accommodate a wide variety of assays within the same microfluidic device. Solution metering, mixing, dilution, incubation and monitoring can be executed in any desired sequence in a system of channels, integrated with a multipurpose flow cell. The channel system and flow cell are fabricated as a monolithic structure mounted atop a conventional multiposition valve. In addition to compactness, the advantage of this ‘lab-on-valve’ system is the permanent rigid position of the sample processing channels that ensures repeatability of microfluidic manipulations, controlled by conventional sized peripherals. With the exception of the integrated microconduit system, that has been designed and mesofabricated by computer aided design (CAD) technology, all peripherals (sequential injection system, fiber optic UV/VIS spectrophotometer-fluorometer) are conventional sized and commercially available components. This provides proven robustness and reliability of operation, and makes the microfluidic system compatible with real life samples and peripheral instruments. The system has been characterized by dye injection, to provide guidelines for method development. Its versatility is documented by a phosphate assay, enzymatic activity assay of protease and by a bioligand interaction assay of immunoglobulin G (IgG) based on its interaction with protein G immobilized on Sepharose beads.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Růžička, J., & Stewart, J. W. B. (1975) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0003-2670(00)89421-0 · Cited by 1,511
(1995) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0161-5 · Cited by 1,250
Microfabricated Centrifugal Microfluidic Systems: Characterization and Multiple Enzymatic Assays
Duffy, D. C., Gillis, H. L., Lin, J., Sheppard, N. F., & Kellogg, G. J. (1999) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac990682c · Cited by 478
Integrated Microanalytical Technology Enabling Rapid and Automated Protein Identification
Ekström, S., Önnerfjord, P., Nilsson, J., Bengtsson, M., Laurell, T., & Marko‐Varga, G. (1999) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac990731l · Cited by 231
Cited by
Armenta, S., Garrigues, S., & de la Guardia, M. (2008) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2008.05.003 · Cited by 1,213
Recent advances in flow injection analysis
Trojanowicz, M., & Kołacińska, K. (2016) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/c5an02522b · Cited by 202
3D-printed lab-on-valve for fluorescent determination of cadmium and lead in water
Mattio, E., Robert-Peillard, F., Vassalo, L., Branger, C., Margaillan, A., Brach-Papa, C., Knoery, J., Boudenne, J.-L., & Coulomb, B. (2018) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2018.02.051 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruzicka, J.
- Venue
- The Analyst
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1053-1060
- ISSN
- 0003-2654 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5528
- OpenAlex
- W2147194612
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lab-on-valve: universal microflow analyzer based on sequential and bead injection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b001125h
- The paper
- Ruzicka, J. (2000). Lab-on-valve: universal microflow analyzer based on sequential and bead injection. The Analyst. https://doi.org/10.1039/b001125h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.