Ab Initio Calculation of the Anisotropy Effect of Multiple Bonds and the Ring Current Effect of Arenes—Application in Conformational and Configurational Analysis
Abstract
Substituents containing magnetically anisotropic chemical bonds, e.g. double bonds, triple bonds or the aromatic phenyl ring, influence the shielding of any nucleus in the molecule by their anisotropy effect dependent on its geometrical position. This effect of the magnetic anisotropy of neighbouring groups on the chemical shift of nuclei is usually specified qualitatively by the anisotropy cone. In this paper, the magnetic anisotropy effect of unsaturated chemical bonds and the ring current effect in arenes have been quantitatively calculated as nuclear independent chemical shieldings (NICSs) in a three dimensional grid of lattice points around the molecule using the GIAO method integrated into the GAUSSIAN 94 calculation program. Plotting the shielding/deshielding data thus obtained as iso-chemical-shielding surfaces (ICSS) around the magnetically anisotropic moieties allows us to quantify both direction and scale of the anisotropy effect. The calculation of the anisotropy effect of double and triple bonds, and the ring current effect of the phenyl ring, has been applied to a number of stereochemical problems; especially in conformational analysis this method proved very successful in quantitatively assigning 1H chemical shifts and hereby the stereochemistry of the molecules studied. In addition, contributions to 1H chemical shifts based on the anisotropy effect of neighbouring groups and based on other substituent effects could be differentiated quantitatively. Considerabl…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity: How to Define Them
Baranac-Stojanović, M. (2025) · Chemistry · doi:10.3390/chemistry7040127 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
The (Anti)aromatic Properties of Cyclo[n]Carbons: Myth or Reality?
Stasyuk, O. A., George, G., Curutchet, C., Plasser, F., & Stasyuk, A. J. (2025) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.70283 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sun, L., Zuo, G., Sun, M., & Zheng, Y. (2026) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.70192
- Venue
- Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2001-08-28
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1893-1898
- ISSN
- 0300-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-779X
- 1364-5471
- OpenAlex
- W1929987042
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 2 (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
- Keywords
- ring current effects, NICS, 1H NMR chemical shifts, conformational analysis, configurational analysis, stereochemistry, double bonds, triple bond, phenyl ring, gauge-including atomic orbitals, substituent effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review