Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,528

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reaction mechanism of soot formation in flames

Frenklach, Michael·2002·Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Abstract

Chemical reactions and physical processes responsible for the formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and soot in hydrocarbon flames are reviewed. The discussion is focused on major elements in the present understanding of the phenomena, clarification of concepts central to the present state of the art, and a summary of new results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/b110045a

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,528

Metadata

Authors
Frenklach, M.
Venue
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Published
2002-02-21
Volume
4
Issue
11
Pages
2028-2037
ISSN
  • 1463-9076 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-9084
OpenAlex
W2156902602
Cited by
1,528
References
0
FWCI
27.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reaction mechanism of soot formation in flames. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b110045a
The paper
Frenklach, M. (2002). Reaction mechanism of soot formation in flames. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1039/b110045a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.