The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preparation and gas separation performance of zeolite T membrane
Abstract
Zeolite T membranes were prepared by hydrothermal synthesis on porous mullite tubes seeded with zeolite T crystals, using milk-like aluminosilicate gel with a molar composition of SiO2∶Al2O3∶Na2O∶K2O∶H2O = 1∶0.05∶0.26∶0.09∶14. A zeolite T crystal layer of about 20 µm in thickness was formed on the outer surface of the support after the synthesis at 373 K for 30 h. Single-gas and mixed-gas permeation experiments through zeolite T membranes were carried out by a vacuum method at 303∼473 K using He, H2, CO2, O2, N2, CH4, C2H6 and C3H8 single-component gases and CO2/N2, CO2/CH4 and other CO2/hydrocarbon mixtures, respectively. In single-gas permeation experiments, with increasing kinetic diameter from 0.33 nm for CO2 to 0.43 nm for C3H8, the gas permeance decreased by four orders in magnitude, indicating a kind of molecular sieving behavior for the zeolite T membranes prepared in this study, that is, they had little defects and their permeation behavior was controlled by zeolitic pores of erionite. Permeance of CO2 was much higher than those of N2 and CH4 and the ideal selectivities for CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 were 31 and 266 at 343 K, respectively. In mixed-gas permeation experiments, zeolite T membranes showed the high selectivities for CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 pairs of 107 and 400, respectively, at 308 K. The selectivity α decreased with an increase in temperature, but was still in a high level of 20 and 52 for CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4, respectively, even at 473 K. This is due to the synergetic effects of competitive adsorption of CO2 and molecular sieving of zeolitic pores. Because of the increasing effect of single file diffusion, the selectivities for CO2/C2H6 (α = 61) and CO2/C3H8 (α = 17) were rather low.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adsorption equilibria and kinetics of CO2, CH4 and N2 in natural zeolites
Hernández-Huesca, R., Dı́az, L., & Aguilar-Armenta, G. (1999) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/s1383-5866(98)00094-x · Cited by 167
Cited by
CO2 capture and separation technologies for end-of-pipe applications – A review
Olajire, A. A. (2010) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.030 · Cited by 1,217
Membrane gas separation technologies for biogas upgrading
Chen, X. Y., Vinh-Thang, H., Ramirez, A. A., Rodrigue, D., & Kaliaguine, S. (2015) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c5ra00666j · Cited by 503
Alumina-Supported SAPO-34 Membranes for CO2/CH4 Separation
Carreon, M. A., Li, S., Falconer, J. L., & Noble, R. D. (2008) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja801294f · Cited by 310
Palomino, M., Corma, A., Rey, F., & Valencia, S. (2010) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la9026656 · Cited by 289
Improved SAPO‐34 Membranes for CO2/CH4 Separations
Li, S., Falconer, J. L., & Noble, R. D. (2006) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200601147 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Cui, Y., Kita, H., & Okamoto, K.-I.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Chemistry
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 924
- ISSN
- 0959-9428 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2078270605
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preparation and gas separation performance of zeolite T membrane. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b311881a
- The paper
- Cui, Y., Kita, H., & Okamoto, K.-I. (2004). Preparation and gas separation performance of zeolite T membrane. Journal of Materials Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/b311881a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.