The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A novel algorithm for non-adiabatic direct dynamics using variational Gaussian wavepackets
Abstract
In a recent paper (G. Worth, P. Hunt and M. Robb, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2003, 107, 621), we used surface hopping direct dynamics calculations to study the molecular dynamics of the butatriene radical cation in the X/A manifold, which is coupled by a conical intersection. Here, we present the first direct dynamics calculations using a novel algorithm, again using this ideal test system. The algorithm, which is based on the powerful multi-configuration time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH) wavepacket propagation method, uses a variational basis of coupled frozen Gaussian functions that optimally represent the evolving nuclear wavepacket at all times. Each Gaussian function follows a "quantum trajectory", along which the potential surface is evaluated by quantum chemistry calculations. As far fewer Gaussian functions are needed than classical trajectories in a semi-classical method, the number of quantum chemical calculations is drastically reduced. A crucial point in direct dynamics. To validate the method, initial calculations have been made using an analytic model Hamiltonian, where it is shown to reproduce the main features of the state population transfer with 8-16 basis functions per state. Coupled to the GAUSSIAN quantum chemistry program, the method is then shown to provide a feasible direct dynamics algorithm for the description of this non-adiabatic process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Manthe, U., Meyer, H.-D., & Cederbaum, L. S. (1992) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.463007 · Cited by 998
Ben-Nun, M., & Martı́nez, T. J. (1998) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.476142 · Cited by 399
Cited by
Ab Initio Nonadiabatic Quantum Molecular Dynamics
Curchod, B. F. E., & Martínez, T. J. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00423 · Cited by 709
Richter, M., Marquetand, P., González-Vázquez, J., Sola, I., & González, L. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct1007394 · Cited by 521
Role of Conical Intersections in Molecular Spectroscopy and Photoinduced Chemical Dynamics
Domcke, W., & Yarkony, D. R. (2012) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103522 · Cited by 508
Brunk, E., & Rothlisberger, U. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500628b · Cited by 494
Quantum dynamics simulations using Gaussian wavepackets: the vMCG method
Richings, G. W., Polyak, I., Spinlove, K. E., Worth, G. A., Burghardt, I., & Lasorne, B. (2015) · International Reviews in Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1080/0144235x.2015.1051354 · Cited by 338
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Worth, G. A., Robb, M. A., & Burghardt, I.
- Venue
- Faraday Discussions
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 127
- Pages
- 307
- ISSN
- 1359-6640 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5498
- OpenAlex
- W2058465572
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A novel algorithm for non-adiabatic direct dynamics using variational Gaussian wavepackets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b314253a
- The paper
- Worth, G. A., Robb, M. A., & Burghardt, I. (2004). A novel algorithm for non-adiabatic direct dynamics using variational Gaussian wavepackets. Faraday Discussions. https://doi.org/10.1039/b314253a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.