The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conical intersection dynamics in solution: The chromophore of Green Fluorescent Protein
Abstract
We use ab initio results to reparameterize a multi-reference semiempirical method to reproduce the ground and excited state potential energy surfaces (PESs) for the chromophore of Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP). The validity of the new parameter set is tested, and the new method is combined with a quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) treatment so that it can be applied in the solution phase. Solvent effects on the energetics of the relevant conical intersections are explored. We then combine this representation of the ground and excited state PESs with the full multiple spawning (FMS) nonadiabatic wavepacket dynamics method to simulate the photodynamics of the neutral GFP chromophore in both gas and solution phases. In these calculations, the PESs and their nonadiabatic couplings are evaluated simultaneously with the nuclear dynamics, ie. "on-the-fly". The effect of solvation is seen to be quite dramatic, resulting in an order of magnitude decrease in the excited state lifetime. We observe a correlated torsion about a double bond and its adjacent single bond in both gas and solution phases. This is discussed in the context of previous proposals about minimal volume isomerization mechanisms in protein environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
VMD: visual molecular dynamics
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., & Schulten, K. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Graphics · doi:10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · Cited by 66,952
Ben-Nun, M., & Martı́nez, T. J. (1998) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.476142 · Cited by 399
Self-citation
Cited by
Isomerization Through Conical Intersections
Levine, B. G., & Martínez, T. J. (2007) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.57.032905.104612 · Cited by 873
Self-citationRecent Advances and Perspectives on Nonadiabatic Mixed Quantum–Classical Dynamics
Crespo-Otero, R., & Barbatti, M. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00577 · Cited by 733
Ab Initio Nonadiabatic Quantum Molecular Dynamics
Curchod, B. F. E., & Martínez, T. J. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00423 · Cited by 709
Self-citationLevine, B. G., Coe, J. D., & Martínez, T. J. (2008) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp0761618 · Cited by 411
Self-citationNonadiabatic Events and Conical Intersections
Matsika, S., & Krause, P. (2011) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103450 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Toniolo, A., Olsen, S., Manohar, L., & Martínez, T. J.
- Venue
- Faraday Discuss.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 127
- Pages
- 149-163
- ISSN
- 1359-6640 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5498
- OpenAlex
- W2113746460
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conical intersection dynamics in solution: The chromophore of Green Fluorescent Protein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b401167h
- The paper
- Toniolo, A., Olsen, S., Manohar, L., & Martínez, T. J. (2004). Conical intersection dynamics in solution: The chromophore of Green Fluorescent Protein. Faraday Discuss. https://doi.org/10.1039/b401167h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.