The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Introductory lecture: Nonadiabatic effects in chemical dynamics
Abstract
Recent progress in the theoretical treatment of electronically nonadiabatic processes is discussed. First we discuss the generalized Born-Oppenheimer approximation, which identifies a subset of strongly coupled states, and the relative advantages and disadvantages of adiabatic and diabatic representations of the coupled surfaces and their interactions are considered. Ab initio diabatic representations that do not require tracking geometric phases or calculating singular nonadiabatic nuclear momentum coupling will be presented as one promising approach for characterizing the coupled electronic states of polyatomic photochemical systems. Such representations can be accomplished by methods based on functionals of the adiabatic electronic density matrix and the identification of reference orbitals for use in an overlap criterion. Next, four approaches to calculating or modeling electronically nonadiabatic dynamics are discussed: (1) accurate quantum mechanical scattering calculations, (2) approximate wave packet methods, (3) surface hopping, and (4) self-consistent-potential semiclassical approaches. The last two of these are particularly useful for polyatomic photochemistry, and recent refinements of these approaches will be discussed. For example, considerable progress has been achieved in making the surface hopping method more applicable to the study of systems with weakly coupled electronic states. This includes introducing uncertainty principle considerations to alleviate the problem of classically forbidden surface hops and the development of an efficient sampling algorithm for low-probability events. A topic whose central importance in a number of quantum mechanical fields is becoming more widely appreciated is the introduction of decoherence into the quantal degrees of freedom to account for the effect of the classical treatment on the other degrees of freedom, and we discuss how the introduction of such decoherence into a self-consistent-potential approximation leads to a reasonably accurate but very practical trajectory method for electronically nonadiabatic processes. Finally, the performances of several dynamical methods for Landau-Zener-type and Rosen-Zener-Demkov-type reactive scattering problems are compared.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MESMER: An Open-Source Master Equation Solver for Multi-Energy Well Reactions
Glowacki, D. R., Liang, C.-H., Morley, C., Pilling, M. J., & Robertson, S. H. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp3051033 · Cited by 629
Role of Conical Intersections in Molecular Spectroscopy and Photoinduced Chemical Dynamics
Domcke, W., & Yarkony, D. R. (2012) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103522 · Cited by 508
Nonadiabatic Events and Conical Intersections
Matsika, S., & Krause, P. (2011) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103450 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Jasper, A. W., Zhu, C., Nangia, S., & Truhlar, D. G.
- Venue
- Faraday Discussions
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 127
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 1359-6640 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5498
- OpenAlex
- W2165942810
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Introductory lecture: Nonadiabatic effects in chemical dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b405601a
- The paper
- Jasper, A. W., Zhu, C., Nangia, S., & Truhlar, D. G. (2004). Introductory lecture: Nonadiabatic effects in chemical dynamics. Faraday Discussions. https://doi.org/10.1039/b405601a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.