Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Parallel tempering: Theory, applications, and new perspectives

Open access
Earl, David J., Deem, Michael W.·2005·Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Abstract

We review the history of the parallel tempering simulation method. From its origins in data analysis, the parallel tempering method has become a standard workhorse of physicochemical simulations. We discuss the theory behind the method and its various generalizations. We mention a selected set of the many applications that have become possible with the introduction of parallel tempering, and we suggest several promising avenues for future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/b509983h

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Cited by

See all 1,313

Metadata

Authors
Earl, D. J., & Deem, M. W.
Venue
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Published
2005
Volume
7
Issue
23
Pages
3910
ISSN
  • 1463-9076 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-9084
OpenAlex
W2170171286
Cited by
1,313
References
59
FWCI
16.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parallel tempering: Theory, applications, and new perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b509983h
The paper
Earl, D. J., & Deem, M. W. (2005). Parallel tempering: Theory, applications, and new perspectives. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1039/b509983h

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.