The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electron sharing indexes at the correlated level. Application to aromaticity calculations
Open accessAbstract
Electron sharing indexes (ESI) have been applied to numerous bonding situations to provide an insight into the nature of the molecular electronic structures. Some of the most popular ESI given in the literature, namely, the delocalization index (DI), defined in the context of the quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM), and the Fuzzy-Atom bond order (FBO), are here calculated at a correlated level for a wide set of molecules. Both approaches are based on the same quantity, the exchange-correlation density, to recover the electron sharing extent, and their differences lie in the definition of an atom in a molecule. In addition, while FBO atomic regions enable accurate and fast integrations, QTAIM definition of an atom leads to atomic domains that occasionally make the integration over these ones rather cumbersome. Besides, when working with a many-body wavefunction one can decide whether to calculate the ESI from first-order density matrices, or from second-order ones. The former way is usually preferred, since it avoids the calculation of the second-order density matrix, which is difficult to handle. Results from both definitions are discussed. Although these indexes are quite similar in their definition and give similar descriptions, when analyzed in greater detail, they reproduce different features of the bonding. In this manuscript DI is shown to explain certain bonding situations that FBO fails to cope with. Finally, these indexes are applied to the description of the aromaticity, through the aromatic fluctuation (FLU) and the para-DI (PDI) indexes. FLU and PDI indexes have been successfully applied using the DI measures, but other ESI based on other partitions such as Fuzzy-Atom can be used. The results provided in this manuscript for carbon skeleton molecules encourage the use of FBO for FLU and PDI indexes even at the correlated level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nucleus-Independent Chemical Shifts (NICS) as an Aromaticity Criterion
Chen, Z., Wannere, C. S., Corminboeuf, C., Puchta, R., & Schleyer, P. V. R. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030088+ · Cited by 3,847
The aromatic fluctuation index (FLU): A new aromaticity index based on electron delocalization
Matito, E., Duran, M., & Solà, M. (2005) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1824895 · Cited by 516
Self-citationPoater, J., Fradera, X., Duran, M., & Solà, M. (2003) · Chemistry – A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.200390041 · Cited by 449
Self-citation
Cited by
Introducing DDEC6 atomic population analysis: part 3. Comprehensive method to compute bond orders
Manz, T. A. (2017) · RSC Adv. · doi:10.1039/c7ra07400j · Cited by 511
Zubarev, D. Y., & Boldyrev, A. I. (2008) · The Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jo801407e · Cited by 278
A uniform approach to the description of multicenter bonding
Szczepanik, D. W., Andrzejak, M., Dyduch, K., Żak, E., Makowski, M., Mazur, G., & Mrozek, J. (2014) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c4cp02932a · Cited by 207
An electronic aromaticity index for large rings
Matito, E. (2016) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c6cp00636a · Cited by 201
Self-citationSzczepanik, D. W., Solà, M., Andrzejak, M., Pawełek, B., Dominikowska, J., Kukułka, M., Dyduch, K., Krygowski, T. M., & Szatylowicz, H. (2017) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.24805 · Cited by 107
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Matito, E., Solà, M., Salvador, P., & Duran, M.
- Venue
- Faraday Discuss.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 135
- Pages
- 325-345
- ISSN
- 1359-6640 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5498
- OpenAlex
- W2104254324
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electron sharing indexes at the correlated level. Application to aromaticity calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b605086g
- The paper
- Matito, E., Solà, M., Salvador, P., & Duran, M. (2007). Electron sharing indexes at the correlated level. Application to aromaticity calculations. Faraday Discuss. https://doi.org/10.1039/b605086g
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.