Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 513

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Density functional theory including dispersion corrections for intermolecular interactions in a large benchmark set of biologically relevant molecules

Antony, Jens, Grimme, Stefan·2006·Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Abstract

Density functional theory including dispersion corrections (DFT-D) is applied to calculate intermolecular interaction energies in an extensive benchmark set consisting mainly of DNA base pairs and amino acid pairs, for which CCSD(T) complete basis set limit estimates are available (JSCH-2005 database). The three generalized gradient approximation (GGA) density functionals B-LYP, PBE and the new B97-D are tested together with the popular hybrid functional B3-LYP. The DFT-D interaction energies deviate on average by less than 1 kcal mol(-1) or 10% from the reference values. In only six out of 161 cases, the deviation exceeds 2 kcal mol(-1). With one exception, the few larger deviations occur for non-equilibrium structures extracted from experimental geometries. The largest absolute deviations are observed for pairs of oppositely charged amino acids which are, however, not significant on a relative basis due to the huge interaction energies > 100 kcal mol(-1) involved. The counterpoise (CP) correction for the basis set superposition error with the applied triple-zeta AO basis sets varies between 0 and -1 kcal mol(-1) (<5% of the interaction energy in most cases) except for four complexes, where it is up to -1.4 kcal mol(-1). It is thus suggested to skip the laborious calculation of the CP correction in DFT-D treatments with reasonable basis sets. The three dispersion corrected GGAs considered differ mainly for the interactions of the hydrogen-bonded DNA base pairs, which are systematically too small by 0.6 kcal mol(-1) in case of B97-D, while for PBE-D they are too high by 1.5 kcal mol(-1), and for B-LYP-D by 0.5 kcal mol(-1). The all in all excellent results that have been obtained at affordable computational costs suggest the DFT-D method to be a routine tool for many applications in organic chemistry or biochemistry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/b612585a

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 513

Metadata

Authors
Antony, J., & Grimme, S.
Venue
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Published
2006
Volume
8
Issue
45
Pages
5287
ISSN
  • 1463-9076 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-9084
OpenAlex
W2139041740
Cited by
513
References
53
FWCI
22.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Density functional theory including dispersion corrections for intermolecular interactions in a large benchmark set of biologically relevant molecules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b612585a
The paper
Antony, J., & Grimme, S. (2006). Density functional theory including dispersion corrections for intermolecular interactions in a large benchmark set of biologically relevant molecules. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1039/b612585a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.