Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structures and interaction energies of stacked graphene–nucleobase complexes

Antony, Jens, Grimme, Stefan·2008·Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Abstract

The noncovalent interactions of nucleobases and hydrogen-bonded (Watson-Crick) base-pairs on graphene are investigated with the DFT-D method, i.e., all-electron density functional theory (DFT) in generalized gradient approximation (GGA) combined with an empirical correction for dispersion (van der Waals) interactions. Full geometry optimization is performed for complexes with graphene sheet models of increasing size (up to C(150)H(30)). Large Gaussian basis sets of at least polarized triple-zeta quality are employed. The interaction energies are extrapolated to infinite lateral size of the sheets. Comparisons are made with B2PLYP-D and SCS-MP2 single point energies for coronene and C(54)H(18) substrates. The contributions to the binding (Pauli exchange repulsion, electrostatic and induction, dispersion) are analyzed. At a frozen inter-fragment distance, the interaction energy surface of the rigid C(96)H(24) and base monomers is explored in three dimensions (two lateral and one rotational). Methodologically and also regarding the results of an energy decomposition analysis, the complexes behave like other pi-stacked systems examined previously. The sequence obtained for the interaction energy of bases with graphene (G > A > T > C > U) is the same for all methods and supports recent experimental findings. The absolute values are rather large (about -20 to -25 kcal mol(-1)) but in the expected range for pi-systems of that size. The relatively short equilibrium inter-plane distance (about 3 A) is consistent with atomic force microscopy results of monolayer guanine and adenine on graphite. In graphene ... Watson-Crick pair complexes, the bases lie differently from their isolated energy minima leading to geometrical anti-cooperativity. Together with an electronic contribution of 2 and 6%, this adds up to total binding anti-cooperativities of 7 and 12% for AT and CG, respectively, on C(96)H(24). Hydrogen bonds themselves are merely affected by binding on graphene.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/b718788b

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Antony, J., & Grimme, S.
Venue
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Published
2008
Volume
10
Issue
19
Pages
2722
ISSN
  • 1463-9076 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-9084
OpenAlex
W1976636290
Cited by
282
References
1
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structures and interaction energies of stacked graphene–nucleobase complexes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b718788b
The paper
Antony, J., & Grimme, S. (2008). Structures and interaction energies of stacked graphene–nucleobase complexes. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1039/b718788b

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.