The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Toxic equivalent concentrations (TEQs) for baseline toxicity and specific modes of action as a tool to improve interpretation of ecotoxicity testing of environmental samples
Abstract
The toxic equivalency concept is a widely applied method to express the toxicity of complex mixtures of compounds that act via receptor-mediated mechanisms such as induction of the arylhydrocarbon or estrogen receptors. Here we propose to extend this concept to baseline toxicity, using the bioluminescence inhibition test with Vibrio fischeri, and an integrative ecotoxicity endpoint, algal growth rate inhibition. Both bioassays were validated by comparison with literature data and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for baseline toxicity were developed for all endpoints. The novel combined algae test, with Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, allows for the simultaneous evaluation of specific inhibition of photosynthesis and growth rate. The contributions of specific inhibition of photosynthesis and non-specific toxicity could be differentiated by comparing the time and endpoint pattern. Photosynthesis efficiency, measured with the saturation pulse method after 2 h of incubation, served as indicator of specific inhibition of photosynthesis by photosystem II inhibitors. Diuron equivalents were defined as toxicity equivalents for this effect. The endpoint of growth rate over 24 h served to derive baseline toxicity equivalent concentrations (baseline-TEQ). By performing binary mixture experiments with reference compounds and complex environmental samples from a sewage treatment plant and a river, the TEQ concept was validated. The proposed method allows for easier interpretation and communication of effect-based water quality monitoring data and provides a basis for comparative analysis with chemical analytical monitoring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Benchmarking the in Vitro Toxicity and Chemical Composition of Plastic Consumer Products
Zimmermann, L., Dierkes, G., Ternes, T. A., Völker, C., & Wagner, M. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b02293 · Cited by 438
Mixtures of Chemical Pollutants at European Legislation Safety Concentrations: How Safe Are They?
Carvalho, R. N., Arukwe, A., Ait-Aissa, S., Bado-Nilles, A., Balzamo, S., Baun, A., Belkin, S., Blaha, L., Brion, F., Conti, D., et al. (2014) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfu118 · Cited by 133
Corrosion protection products as a source of bisphenol A and toxicity to the aquatic environment
Vermeirssen, E. L. M., Dietschweiler, C., Werner, I., & Burkhardt, M. (2017) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.006 · Cited by 82
Self-citationLeusch, F. D. L., Neale, P. A., Busetti, F., Card, M., Humpage, A., Orbell, J. D., Ridgway, H. F., Stewart, M. B., van de Merwe, J. P., & Escher, B. I. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.106 · Cited by 61
Self-citationThe Combined Algae Test for the Evaluation of Mixture Toxicity in Environmental Samples
Glauch, L., & Escher, B. I. (2020) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.4873 · Cited by 31
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Escher, B. I., Bramaz, N., Mueller, J. F., Quayle, P., Rutishauser, S., & Vermeirssen, E. L. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Monitoring
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 612
- ISSN
- 1464-0325 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0333
- OpenAlex
- W2149189609
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toxic equivalent concentrations (TEQs) for baseline toxicity and specific modes of action as a tool to improve interpretation of ecotoxicity testing of environmental samples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b800949j
- The paper
- Escher, B. I., Bramaz, N., Mueller, J. F., Quayle, P., Rutishauser, S., & Vermeirssen, E. L. M. (2008). Toxic equivalent concentrations (TEQs) for baseline toxicity and specific modes of action as a tool to improve interpretation of ecotoxicity testing of environmental samples. Journal of Environmental Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.1039/b800949j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.