The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A first principles comparison of the mechanism and site requirements for the electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol and formic acid over Pt
Abstract
First principles density functional theoretical calculations were carried out to examine and compare the reaction paths and ensembles for the electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol and formic acid in the presence of solution and applied electrochemical potential. Methanol proceeds via both direct and indirect pathways which are governed by the initial C-H and O-H bond activation, respectively. The primary path requires an ensemble size of between 3-4 Pt atoms, whereas the secondary path is much less structure sensitive, requiring only 1-2 metal atoms. The CO that forms inhibits the surface at potentials below 0.66 V NHE. The addition of Ru results in bifunctional as well as electronic effects that lower the onset potential for CO oxidation. In comparison, formic acid proceeds via direct, indirect and formate pathways. The direct path, which involves the activation of the C-H bond followed by the rapid activation of the O-H bond, was calculated to be the predominant path especially at potentials greater than 0.6 V. The activation of the O-H bond of formic acid has a very low barrier and readily proceeds to form surface formate intermediates as the first step of the indirect formate path. Adsorbed formate, however, was calculated to be very stable, and thus acts as a spectator species. At potentials below 0.6 V NHE, CO, which forms via the non-Faradaic hydrolytic splitting of the C-O bond over stepped or defect sites in the indirect path, can build up and poison the surface. The results indicate that the direct path only requires a single Pt atom whereas the indirect path requires a larger surface ensemble and stepped sites. This suggests that alloys will not have the same influence on formic acid oxidation as they do for methanol oxidation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations
Monkhorst, H. J., & Pack, J. D. (1976) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.13.5188 · Cited by 71,721
Cited by
Yang, S., Kim, J., Tak, Y. J., Soon, A., & Lee, H. (2016) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201509241 · Cited by 899
Single-atom Rh/N-doped carbon electrocatalyst for formic acid oxidation
Xiong, Y., Dong, J., Huang, Z.-Q., Xin, P., Chen, W., Wang, Y., Li, Z., Jin, Z., Xing, W., Zhuang, Z., et al. (2020) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-020-0665-x · Cited by 610
Theoretical Heterogeneous Catalysis: Scaling Relationships and Computational Catalyst Design
Greeley, J. (2016) · Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-080615-034413 · Cited by 409
Yang, N., Zhang, Z., Chen, B., Huang, Y., Chen, J., Lai, Z., Chen, Y., Sindoro, M., Wang, A., Cheng, H., et al. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201700769 · Cited by 292
Single‐Atom Catalysts of Precious Metals for Electrochemical Reactions
Kim, J., Kim, H., & Lee, H. (2018) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201701306 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Neurock, M., Janik, M., & Wieckowski, A.
- Venue
- Faraday Discuss.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 140
- Pages
- 363-378
- ISSN
- 1359-6640 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5498
- OpenAlex
- W2031803642
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A first principles comparison of the mechanism and site requirements for the electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol and formic acid over Pt. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b804591g
- The paper
- Neurock, M., Janik, M., & Wieckowski, A. (2009). A first principles comparison of the mechanism and site requirements for the electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol and formic acid over Pt. Faraday Discuss. https://doi.org/10.1039/b804591g
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.