The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Membrane-based technologies for biogas separations
Abstract
Over the past two decades, membrane processes have gained a lot of attention for the separation of gases. They have been found to be very suitable for wide scale applications owing to their reasonable cost, good selectivity and easily engineered modules. This critical review primarily focuses on the various aspects of membrane processes related to the separation of biogas, more in specific CO(2) and H(2)S removal from CH(4) and H(2) streams. Considering the limitations of inorganic materials for membranes, the present review will only focus on work done with polymeric materials. An overview on the performance of commercial membranes and lab-made membranes highlighting the problems associated with their applications will be given first. The development studies carried out to enhance the performance of membranes for gas separation will be discussed in the subsequent section. This review has been broadly divided into three sections (i) performance of commercial polymeric membranes (ii) performance of lab-made polymeric membranes and (iii) performance of mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) for gas separations. It will include structural modifications at polymer level, polymer blending, as well as synthesis of mixed matrix membranes, for which addition of silane-coupling agents and selection of suitable fillers will receive special attention. Apart from an overview of the different membrane materials, the study will also highlight the effects of different operating conditions that eventually decide the performance and longevity of membrane applications in gas separations. The discussion will be largely restricted to the studies carried out on polyimide (PI), cellulose acetate (CA), polysulfone (PSf) and polydimethyl siloxane (PDMS) membranes, as these membrane materials have been most widely used for commercial applications. Finally, the most important strategies that would ensure new commercial applications will be discussed (156 references).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials
Yaghi, O. M., O'Keeffe, M., Ockwig, N. W., Chae, H. K., Eddaoudi, M., & Kim, J. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01650 · Cited by 9,101
Robeson, L. M. (2008) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030 · Cited by 5,917
Correlation of separation factor versus permeability for polymeric membranes
Robeson, L. M. (1991) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/0376-7388(91)80060-j · Cited by 3,465
Polymer Nanocomposites Containing Carbon Nanotubes
Moniruzzaman, M., & Winey, K. I. (2006) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma060733p · Cited by 3,416
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Designed Synthesis of 3D Covalent Organic Frameworks
El-Kaderi, H. M., Hunt, J. R., Mendoza-Cortés, J. L., Côté, A. P., Taylor, R. E., O'Keeffe, M., & Yaghi, O. M. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1139915 · Cited by 2,575
Metal–organic frameworks—prospective industrial applications
Mueller, U., Schubert, M., Teich, F., Puetter, H., Schierle-Arndt, K., & Pastré, J. (2006) · J. Mater. Chem. · doi:10.1039/b511962f · Cited by 2,325
Future Directions of Membrane Gas Separation Technology
Baker, R. W. (2002) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie0108088 · Cited by 1,938
Chung, T.-S., Jiang, L. Y., Li, Y., & Kulprathipanja, S. (2007) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.01.008 · Cited by 1,781
Atlas of Zeolite Structure Types
Meier, W. M., Olson, D., & Baerlocher, C. (1988) · Cited by 1,284
Cited by
Sun, Q., Li, H., Yan, J., Liu, L., Yu, Z., & Yu, X. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.029 · Cited by 924
Biogas as a renewable energy fuel – A review of biogas upgrading, utilisation and storage
Ullah Khan, I., Hafiz Dzarfan Othman, M., Hashim, H., Matsuura, T., Ismail, A. F., Rezaei-DashtArzhandi, M., & Wan Azelee, I. (2017) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.035 · Cited by 775
Current status and development of membranes for CO2/CH4 separation: A review
Zhang, Y., Sunarso, J., Liu, S., & Wang, R. (2013) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.10.009 · Cited by 675
Muñoz, R., Meier, L., Diaz, I., & Jeison, D. (2015) · Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology · doi:10.1007/s11157-015-9379-1 · Cited by 674
Predictive Models for Mixed-Matrix Membrane Performance: A Review
Vinh-Thang, H., & Kaliaguine, S. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003888 · Cited by 554
Metadata
- Authors
- Basu, S., Khan, A. L., Cano-Odena, A., Liu, C., & Vankelecom, I. F. J.
- Venue
- Chem. Soc. Rev.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 750-768
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W1971658111
- Cited by
- 578
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 8.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Membrane-based technologies for biogas separations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b817050a
- The paper
- Basu, S., Khan, A. L., Cano-Odena, A., Liu, C., & Vankelecom, I. F. J. (2010). Membrane-based technologies for biogas separations. Chem. Soc. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1039/b817050a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.