The DOI matches its Crossref record; 178 of the 178 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platforms: requirements, characteristics and applications
Open accessAbstract
This critical review summarizes developments in microfluidic platforms that enable the miniaturization, integration, automation and parallelization of (bio-)chemical assays (see S. Haeberle and R. Zengerle, Lab Chip, 2007, 7, 1094-1110, for an earlier review). In contrast to isolated application-specific solutions, a microfluidic platform provides a set of fluidic unit operations, which are designed for easy combination within a well-defined fabrication technology. This allows the easy, fast, and cost-efficient implementation of different application-specific (bio-)chemical processes. In our review we focus on recent developments from the last decade (2000s). We start with a brief introduction into technical advances, major market segments and promising applications. We continue with a detailed characterization of different microfluidic platforms, comprising a short definition, the functional principle, microfluidic unit operations, application examples as well as strengths and limitations of every platform. The microfluidic platforms in focus are lateral flow tests, linear actuated devices, pressure driven laminar flow, microfluidic large scale integration, segmented flow microfluidics, centrifugal microfluidics, electrokinetics, electrowetting, surface acoustic waves, and dedicated systems for massively parallel analysis. This review concludes with the attempt to provide a selection scheme for microfluidic platforms which is based on their characteristics according to key requirements of different applications and market segments. Applied selection criteria comprise portability, costs of instrument and disposability, sample throughput, number of parameters per sample, reagent consumption, precision, diversity of microfluidic unit operations and the flexibility in programming different liquid handling protocols (295 references).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The origins and the future of microfluidics
Whitesides, G. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05058 · Cited by 9,687
Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors
Margulies, M., Egholm, M., Altman, W. E., Attiya, S., Bader, J. S., Bemben, L. A., Berka, J., Braverman, M. S., Chen, Y.-J., Chen, Z., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03959 · Cited by 7,693
Self-citationDispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube
Taylor, G. I. (1953) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1953.0139 · Cited by 5,109
Monolithic Microfabricated Valves and Pumps by Multilayer Soft Lithography
Unger, M. A., Chou, H.-P., Thorsen, T., Scherer, A., & Quake, S. R. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5463.113 · Cited by 4,010
Miniaturized total chemical analysis systems: A novel concept for chemical sensing
Manz, A., Graber, N., & Widmer, H. M. (1990) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/0925-4005(90)80209-i · Cited by 3,122
Teh, S.-Y., Lin, R., Hung, L.-H., & Lee, A. P. (2008) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b715524g · Cited by 2,690
Formation of dispersions using “flow focusing” in microchannels
Anna, S. L., Bontoux, N., & Stone, H. A. (2003) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.1537519 · Cited by 2,302
Microfluidic Large-Scale Integration
Thorsen, T., Maerkl, S. J., & Quake, S. R. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1076996 · Cited by 2,222
Electrowetting: from basics to applications
Mugele, F., & Baret, J.-C. (2005) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/17/28/r01 · Cited by 2,092
Microfluidic diagnostic technologies for global public health
Yager, P., Edwards, T., Fu, E., Helton, K., Nelson, K., Tam, M. R., & Weigl, B. H. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05064 · Cited by 1,979
Cited by
Advantages and challenges of microfluidic cell culture in polydimethylsiloxane devices
Halldorsson, S., Lucumi, E., Gómez-Sjöberg, R., & Fleming, R. M. T. (2015) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2014.07.029 · Cited by 1,027
Prebiotic Systems Chemistry: New Perspectives for the Origins of Life
Ruiz-Mirazo, K., Briones, C., & de la Escosura, A. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr2004844 · Cited by 930
Lopez-Ruiz, N., Curto, V. F., Erenas, M. M., Benito-Lopez, F., Diamond, D., Palma, A. J., & Capitan-Vallvey, L. F. (2014) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac5019205 · Cited by 423
Point of care testing: The impact of nanotechnology
Syedmoradi, L., Daneshpour, M., Alvandipour, M., Gomez, F. A., Hajghassem, H., & Omidfar, K. (2017) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2016.08.084 · Cited by 367
Xu, Z., Gao, Y., Hao, Y., Li, E., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, W., Gao, Z., & Wang, Q. (2013) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.045 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Mark, D., Haeberle, S., Roth, G., von Stetten, F., & Zengerle, R.
- Venue
- Chemical Society Reviews
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1153
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W2154347237
- Cited by
- 1,647
- References
- 178
- FWCI
- 8.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platforms: requirements, characteristics and applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b820557b
- The paper
- Mark, D., Haeberle, S., Roth, G., von Stetten, F., & Zengerle, R. (2010). Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platforms: requirements, characteristics and applications. Chemical Society Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1039/b820557b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.