Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multi-step microfluidic droplet processing: kinetic analysis of an in vitro translated enzyme

Mazutis, Linas, Baret, Jean-Christophe, Treacy, Patrick, Skhiri, Yousr, Araghi, Ali Fallah, Ryckelynck, Michael, Taly, Valérie, Griffiths, Andrew D.·2009·Lab on a Chip

Abstract

Microdroplets in water-in-oil emulsions can be used as microreactors with volumes 10(3) to 10(9) times smaller than the smallest working volumes in a microtitre plate well (1-2 microL). However, many reactions and assays require multiple steps where new reagents are added at defined times, to start, modify or terminate a reaction. The most flexible way to add new reagents to pre-formed droplets is by controlled, pairwise droplet fusion. We describe a droplet-based microfluidic system capable of performing multiple operations, including pairwise droplet fusion, to analyze complex and sequential multi-step reactions. It is exemplified by performing a series of six on-chip and two off-chip operations which enable the coupled in vitro transcription and translation of cotA laccase genes in droplets and, after performing a controlled fusion with droplets containing laccase assay reagents, the end-point and kinetic analysis of the catalytic activity of the translated protein. In vitro translation and the laccase assay must be performed sequentially as the conditions for the laccase assay are not compatible with in vitro translation. Droplet fusion was performed by electrocoalescence at a rate of approximately 3000 fusion events per second and nearly 90% of droplets were fused one-to-one (one droplet containing in vitro translated laccase fused to one droplet containing the reagents for the laccase assay). The ability to uncouple the enzymatic assay from in vitro translation greatly extends the range of activities of in vitro translated proteins that can potentially be screened in droplet-based microfluidic systems. Furthermore, the system also opens up the possibility of performing a wide range of other new (bio)chemical reactions in droplets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/b907753g

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 205

Metadata

Authors
Mazutis, L., Baret, J.-C., Treacy, P., Skhiri, Y., Araghi, A. F., Ryckelynck, M., Taly, V., & Griffiths, A. D.
Venue
Lab on a Chip
Published
2009
Volume
9
Issue
20
Pages
2902
ISSN
  • 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0197
OpenAlex
W2025915013
Cited by
205
References
1
FWCI
10.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-step microfluidic droplet processing: kinetic analysis of an in vitro translated enzyme. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b907753g
The paper
Mazutis, L., Baret, J.-C., Treacy, P., Skhiri, Y., Araghi, A. F., Ryckelynck, M., Taly, V., & Griffiths, A. D. (2009). Multi-step microfluidic droplet processing: kinetic analysis of an in vitro translated enzyme. Lab on a Chip. https://doi.org/10.1039/b907753g

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.