The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
One-pot polymerization, surface grafting, and processing of waterborne polyurethane-cellulose nanocrystal nanocomposites
Abstract
A series of new waterborne polyurethane (WPU)/cellulose nanocrystal (CN) composites have been successfully synthesized viain situpolymerization. The conditions were optimized to induce the grafting of part of the pre-synthesized WPU chains on the surface of cellulose nanocrystals (CNs) and the corresponding nanocomposites were processed by casting and evaporation. The morphology, structural, thermal, and mechanical properties of the resulting nanocomposite films were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy, wide-angle X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry, dynamic mechanical analysis, and tensile tests. The success of the grafting was substantiated by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. Thus, it was demonstrated that the grafted WPU chains formed crystalline domains on the surface of CNs which expedited the crystallization of the polycaprolactone (PCL) soft segment domains in the WPU/CN nanocomposites. This co-crystallization phenomenon induced the formation of a co-continuous phase between the matrix and filler which significantly enhanced the interfacial adhesion and consequently contributed to an improvement in the thermal stability and mechanical strength of the nanocomposites. Although the ductility of the final nanocomposites was slightly reduced, in the CN content range from 0 to 10 wt-%, the Young's modulus and strength were significantly improved as shown by the change from 1.7 to 107.4 MPa and 4.4 to 9.7 MPa, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beck-Candanedo, S., Roman, M., & Gray, D. G. (2005) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm049300p · Cited by 1,588
Polymer nanocomposites reinforced by cellulose whiskers
Favier, V., Chanzy, H., & Cavaille, J. Y. (1995) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00122a053 · Cited by 1,149
Elastic modulus and stress-transfer properties of tunicate cellulose whiskers
Šturcová, A., Davies, G. R., & Eichhorn, S. J. (2005) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm049291k · Cited by 953
Sugiyama, J., Vuong, R., & Chanzy, H. (1991) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00014a033 · Cited by 791
Araki, J., Wada, M., Kuga, S., & Okano, T. (1998) · Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects · doi:10.1016/s0927-7757(98)00404-x · Cited by 769
Helbert, W., Cavaillé, J. Y., & Dufresne, A. (1996) · Polymer Composites · doi:10.1002/pc.10650 · Cited by 473
Nanocomposites of cellulose acetate butyrate reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals
Grunert, M., & Winter, W. T. (2002) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1023/a:1021065905986 · Cited by 465
Morphological investigation of nanocomposites from sorbitol plasticized starch and tunicin whiskers
Mathew, A. P., & Dufresne, A. (2002) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm0101769 · Cited by 384
Cited by
Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications
Habibi, Y., Lucia, L. A., & Rojas, O. J. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900339w · Cited by 5,980
Self-citationCellulose nanocrystals and related nanocomposites: Review of some properties and challenges
Mariano, M., El Kissi, N., & Dufresne, A. (2014) · Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics · doi:10.1002/polb.23490 · Cited by 933
Peng, B. L., Dhar, N., Liu, H. L., & Tam, K. C. (2011) · The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1002/cjce.20554 · Cited by 890
Lin, N., Huang, J., & Dufresne, A. (2012) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c2nr30260h · Cited by 885
Cellulose: A Review of Water Interactions, Applications in Composites, and Water Treatment
Etale, A., Onyianta, A. J., Turner, S. R., & Eichhorn, S. J. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00477 · Cited by 817
Metadata
- Authors
- Cao, X., Habibi, Y., & Lucia, L. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Chemistry
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 7137
- ISSN
- 0959-9428 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2041936907
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.