Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microstructural regimes of colloidal rod suspensions, gels, and glasses

Solomon, Michael J., Spicer, Patrick T.·2010·Soft Matter

Abstract

We review the diverse range of materials made up of rod-shaped colloids. A common feature of such suspensions is the strong and efficient contribution of rods to the material's solid-like rheological properties such as elastic modulus and yield stress. Colloidal rod suspensions span from biomaterials such as f-actin and fd virus to inorganic materials such as boehmite and hematite, and to commercial fibers such as cellulose. We argue that, depending on the strength of pair potential interactions, such rod suspensions form microstructures that vary between the two limits of heterogeneous fractal clusters and homogeneous fiber networks. The volume fraction range for transition between these two limiting cases is strongly aspect ratio dependent. The two limiting microstructures can be distinguished by differences in the scattering vector dependence of their structure factors, as long as the range of scattering vector probed is sufficient to span regimes both above and below qL ≈ 1. Here q is the scattering vector and L is the rod length. Theories of the Brownian dynamics of fractal clusters and fiber networks show that the two types of microstructure can lead to the arrested dynamics of gelation and the glass transition, respectively. The volume fraction and aspect ratio dependences of the dynamical slowing down of these two cases differ significantly; we suggest that probing these differences is a convenient way to distinguish between gels and glasses of colloidal rods. This distinction is important to clarify because these microstructures are determinants of rheological properties such as elasticity and yielding. By combining these structural and dynamical ideas about rods, we classify a set of literature measurements on more than fifteen different colloidal materials and thereby distinguish between regimes of gelation and vitrification. We conclude by suggesting directions for future research in the arrested dynamics, the non-linear rheology, and the absolute lower limit of gelation in colloidal rod suspensions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/b918281k

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Solomon, M. J., & Spicer, P. T.
Venue
Soft Matter
Published
2010
Volume
6
Issue
7
Pages
1391
ISSN
  • 1744-683X (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-6848
OpenAlex
W2037955937
Cited by
296
References
58
FWCI
8.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microstructural regimes of colloidal rod suspensions, gels, and glasses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b918281k
The paper
Solomon, M. J., & Spicer, P. T. (2010). Microstructural regimes of colloidal rod suspensions, gels, and glasses. Soft Matter. https://doi.org/10.1039/b918281k

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.