The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Freezing, melting and structure of ice in a hydrophilic nanopore
Open accessAbstract
The nucleation, growth, structure and melting of ice in 3 nm diameter hydrophilic nanopores are studied through molecular dynamics simulations with the mW water model. The melting temperature of water in the pore was T(m)(pore) = 223 K, 51 K lower than the melting point of bulk water in the model and in excellent agreement with experimental determinations for 3 nm silica pores. Liquid and ice coexist in equilibrium at the melting point and down to temperatures as low as 180 K. Liquid water is located at the interface of the pore wall, increasing from one monolayer at the freezing temperature, T(f)(pore) = 195 K, to two monolayers a few degrees below T(m)(pore). Crystallization of ice in the pore occurs through homogeneous nucleation. At the freezing temperature, the critical nucleus contains approximately 75 to 100 molecules, with a radius of gyration similar to the radius of the pore. The critical nuclei contain features of both cubic and hexagonal ice, although stacking of hexagonal and cubic layers is not defined until the nuclei reach approximately 150 molecules. The structure of the confined ice is rich in stacking faults, in agreement with the interpretation of X-ray and neutron diffraction experiments. Though the presence of cubic layers is twice as prevalent as hexagonal ones, the crystals should not be considered defective Ic as sequences with more than three adjacent cubic (or hexagonal) layers are extremely rare in the confined ice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics
Plimpton, S. (1995) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 · Cited by 44,721
Phase Transitions Induced by Nanoconfinement in Liquid Water
Giovambattista, N., Rossky, P. J., & Debenedetti, P. G. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.050603 · Cited by 253
Cited by
Simulating water with rigid non-polarizable models: a general perspective
Vega, C., & Abascal, J. L. F. (2011) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c1cp22168j · Cited by 991
Elliott, G. D., Wang, S., & Fuller, B. J. (2017) · Cryobiology · doi:10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.04.004 · Cited by 534
Homogeneous Ice Nucleation at Moderate Supercooling from Molecular Simulation
Sanz, E., Vega, C., Espinosa, J. R., Caballero-Bernal, R., Abascal, J. L. F., & Valeriani, C. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja4028814 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, E. B., de la Llave, E., Welke, K., Scherlis, D. A., & Molinero, V.
- Venue
- Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 4124
- ISSN
- 1463-9076 (ISSN-L)
- 1463-9084
- OpenAlex
- W2004832076
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Freezing, melting and structure of ice in a hydrophilic nanopore. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b919724a
- The paper
- Moore, E. B., de la Llave, E., Welke, K., Scherlis, D. A., & Molinero, V. (2010). Freezing, melting and structure of ice in a hydrophilic nanopore. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1039/b919724a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.