Cited by 287Bioeconomy and Sustainability DevelopmentBioenergy crop production and managementBiofuel production and bioconversion

Bioenergy revisited: key factors in global potentials of bioenergy

Open access
Dornburg, Veronika, van Vuuren, Detlef, van de Ven, Gerrie, Langeveld, Hans, Meeusen, Marieke, Banse, Martin, van Oorschot, Mark, Ros, Jan +7 more·2010·Energy & Environmental Science

Abstract

The growing use of bioenergy goes hand in hand with a heated public debate, in which conflicting claims are made regarding the amount of biomass that can be sustainably used for this purpose. This article assesses the current knowledge on biomass resource potentials and interrelated factors such as water availability, biodiversity, food demand, energy demand and agricultural commodity markets. A sensitivity analysis of the available information narrows the range of biomass potentials from 0–1500 EJ/yr to approximately 200–500 EJ/yr in 2050. In determining the latter range, water limitations, biodiversity protection and food demand are taken into consideration. Key factors are agricultural efficiency and crop choice. In principle, global biomass potentials could meet up to one third of the projected global energy demand in 2050.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/b922422j

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 287

Authors
Dornburg, V., van Vuuren, D., van de Ven, G., Langeveld, H., Meeusen, M., Banse, M., van Oorschot, M., Ros, J., Jan van den Born, G., Aiking, H., Londo, M., Mozaffarian, H., Verweij, P., Lysen, E., & Faaij, A.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (NL)
Venue
Energy & Environmental Science
Published
2010
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
258
ISSN
  • 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-5706
OpenAlex
W2065308236
Cited by
287
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 33
FWCI
114.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy & Environmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
bioenergy, water availability, biodiversity conservation, food demand, energy demand, agricultural commodity markets, agricultural efficiency, crop selection, sensitivity analysis, 2050 projections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review