The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping hydrophobicity at the nanoscale: Applications to heterogeneous surfaces and proteins
Abstract
Approaches to quantify wetting at the macroscale do not translate to the nanoscale, highlighting the need for new methods for characterizing hydrophobicity at the small scale. We use extensive molecular simulations to study the hydration of homo and heterogeneous self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) and of protein surfaces. For homogeneous SAMs, new pressure-dependent analysis shows that water displays higher compressibility and enhanced density fluctuations near hydrophobic surfaces, which are gradually quenched with increasing hydrophilicity, consistent with our previous studies. Heterogeneous surfaces show an interesting context dependence--adding a single -OH group in a CH3 terminated SAM has a more dramatic effect on water in the vicinity compared to that of a single CH3 group in an -OH background. For mixed -CH3/-OH SAMs, this asymmetry leads to a non-linear dependence of hydrophobicity on the surface concentration. We also present preliminary results to map hydrophobicity of protein surfaces by monitoring local density fluctuations and binding of probe hydrophobic solutes. These molecular measures account for the behavior of protein's hydration water, and present a more refined picture of its hydrophobicity map. At least for one protein, hydrophobin-II, we show that the hydrophobicity map is different from that suggested by a commonly used hydropathy scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
VMD: visual molecular dynamics
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., & Schulten, K. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Graphics · doi:10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · Cited by 66,952
Giasson, B. I., Murray, I. V. J., Trojanowski, J. Q., & Lee, V. M.-Y. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m008919200 · Cited by 1,080
Dynamics of n-alkanes: Comparison to Rouse model
Mondello, M., Grest, G. S., Webb, E. B., & Peczak, P. (1998) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.476619 · Cited by 118
Cited by
Hydrophilic directional slippery rough surfaces for water harvesting
Dai, X., Sun, N., Nielsen, S. O., Stogin, B. B., Wang, J., Yang, S., & Wong, T.-S. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaq0919 · Cited by 553
Giovambattista, N., Rossky, P. J., & Debenedetti, P. G. (2012) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-032811-112007 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Acharya, H., Vembanur, S., Jamadagni, S. N., & Garde, S.
- Venue
- Faraday Discussions
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 146
- Pages
- 353
- ISSN
- 1359-6640 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5498
- OpenAlex
- W2058862385
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping hydrophobicity at the nanoscale: Applications to heterogeneous surfaces and proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b927019a
- The paper
- Acharya, H., Vembanur, S., Jamadagni, S. N., & Garde, S. (2010). Mapping hydrophobicity at the nanoscale: Applications to heterogeneous surfaces and proteins. Faraday Discussions. https://doi.org/10.1039/b927019a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.