The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anion receptor chemistry: highlights from 2008 and 2009
Abstract
This critical review covers advances in anion complexation in the year 2008 and 2009. The review discusses anion receptors that employ hydrogen bond donors (both NH and CH), electrostatic interactions, Lewis acidic centres and combinations of these three types of binding interaction to complex anions. Additionally nanotechnological approaches to anion sensing in aqueous solution, lipid bilayer transporters and recent work on the use of anions to drive conformational change are highlighted (130 references).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biological applications of functionalized calixarenes
Nimse, S. B., & Kim, T. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c2cs35233h · Cited by 435
Exploiting outer-sphere interactions to enhance metal recovery by solvent extraction
Turkington, J. R., Bailey, P. J., Love, J. B., Wilson, A. M., & Tasker, P. A. (2013) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c2cc37874d · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Gale, P. A.
- Venue
- Chemical Society Reviews
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3746
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W2916225125
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anion receptor chemistry: highlights from 2008 and 2009. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c001871f
- The paper
- Gale, P. A. (2010). Anion receptor chemistry: highlights from 2008 and 2009. Chemical Society Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1039/c001871f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
