The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A microfluidic platform for complete mammalian cell culture
Abstract
We introduce the first lab-on-a-chip platform for complete mammalian cell culture. The new method is powered by digital microfluidics (DMF), a technique in which nanolitre-sized droplets are manipulated on an open surface of an array of electrodes. This is the first application of DMF to adherent cell culture and analysis, and more importantly, represents the first microfluidic platform capable of implementing all of the steps required for mammalian cell culture-cell seeding, growth, detachment, and re-seeding on a fresh surface. Three key innovations were required to implement complete cell culture on a microfluidic device: (1) a technique for growing cells on patterned islands (or "adhesion pads") positioned on an array of DMF actuation electrodes; (2) a method for rapidly and efficiently exchanging media and other reagents on cells grown on adhesion pads; and (3) a system capable of detachment and collection of cells from an (old) origin site and delivery to a (new) destination site for subculture. The new technique was applied to cells from several different lines which were seeded and repeatedly subcultured for weeks at a time in 150 nL droplets. Cells handled in this manner exhibited growth characteristics and morphology comparable to those cultured in standard tissue culture vessels. To illustrate an application for this system, a microfluidic method was developed to implement transient transfection-we propose that the combination of this technique with multigenerational culture allows for "on-demand" generation of transiently transfected cells. Broadly, we anticipate that the automated cell microculture technique presented here will be useful in myriad applications that would benefit from automated mammalian cell culture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Microfluidic platform for hepatitis B viral replication study
Sodunke, T. R., Bouchard, M. J., & Noh, H. (. (2008) · Biomedical Microdevices · doi:10.1007/s10544-007-9148-1 · Cited by 38
Cited by
Microvalves and Micropumps for BioMEMS
Au, A. K., Lai, H., Utela, B. R., & Folch, A. (2011) · Micromachines · doi:10.3390/mi2020179 · Cited by 332
Digital microfluidics: a versatile tool for applications in chemistry, biology and medicine
Jebrail, M. J., Bartsch, M. S., & Patel, K. D. (2012) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c2lc40318h · Cited by 324
Micro Total Analysis Systems for Cell Biology and Biochemical Assays
Kovarik, M. L., Gach, P. C., Ornoff, D. M., Wang, Y., Balowski, J., Farrag, L., & Allbritton, N. L. (2012) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac202611x · Cited by 270
Moshksayan, K., Kashaninejad, N., Warkiani, M. E., Lock, J. G., Moghadas, H., Firoozabadi, B., Saidi, M. S., & Nguyen, N.-T. (2018) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/j.snb.2018.01.223 · Cited by 267
Hepatic organoids for microfluidic drug screening
Au, S. H., Chamberlain, M. D., Mahesh, S., Sefton, M. V., & Wheeler, A. R. (2014) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c4lc00531g · Cited by 162
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Barbulovic-Nad, I., Au, S. H., & Wheeler, A. R.
- Venue
- Lab on a Chip
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1536
- ISSN
- 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0197
- OpenAlex
- W1981190303
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.