The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Enhancement of long stability of sulfur cathode by encapsulating sulfur into micropores of carbon spheres
Abstract
To enhance the long stability of sulfur cathode for a high energy lithium–sulfur battery system, a sulfur–carbon sphere composite was prepared by encapsulating sulfur into micropores of carbon spheres by thermal treatment of a mixture of sublimed sulfur and carbon spheres. The elemental sulfur exists as a highly dispersed state inside the micropores of carbon spheres with a large surface area and a narrow pore distribution, based on the analyses of the X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), thermogravimetry (TG) and local element line-scanning. It is demonstrated from galvanostatic discharge–charge process, cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) that the sulfur–carbon sphere composite has a large reversible capacity and an excellent high rate discharge capability as cathode materials. In particular, the sulfur–carbon sphere composite with 42 wt% sulfur presents a long electrochemical stability up to 500 cycles, based on the constrained electrochemical reaction inside the narrow micropores of carbon spheres due to strong adsorption. Therefore, the electrochemical reaction constrained inside the micropores proposed here would be the dominant factor for the enhanced long stability of the sulfur cathode. The knowledge acquired in this study is important not only for the design of efficient new electrode materials, but also for understanding the effect of the micropores on the electrochemical cycle stability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Challenges and Prospects of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Manthiram, A., Fu, Y., & Su, Y.-S. (2013) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar300179v · Cited by 2,380
Wang, H., Yang, Y., Liang, Y., Robinson, J. T., Li, Y., Jackson, A., Cui, Y., & Dai, H. (2011) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl200658a · Cited by 2,119
Smaller Sulfur Molecules Promise Better Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Xin, S., Gu, L., Zhao, N.-H., Yin, Y.-X., Zhou, L.-J., Guo, Y.-G., & Wan, L.-J. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja308170k · Cited by 1,644
Graphene and Graphene‐Based Materials for Energy Storage Applications
Zhu, J., Yang, D., Yin, Z., Yan, Q., & Zhang, H. (2014) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201303202 · Cited by 825
A High‐Energy Room‐Temperature Sodium‐Sulfur Battery
Xin, S., Yin, Y., Guo, Y., & Wan, L. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201304126 · Cited by 632
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, B., Qin, X., Li, G. R., & Gao, X. P.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1531
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2078893562
- Cited by
- 1,280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancement of long stability of sulfur cathode by encapsulating sulfur into micropores of carbon spheres. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c002639e
- The paper
- Zhang, B., Qin, X., Li, G. R., & Gao, X. P. (2010). Enhancement of long stability of sulfur cathode by encapsulating sulfur into micropores of carbon spheres. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c002639e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.