The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From MFC to MXC: chemical and biological cathodes and their potential for microbial bioelectrochemical systems
Abstract
Microbial fuel cells (MFC) are the archetype microbial bioelectrochemical system (BES), producing electricity from microbially catalyzed anodic oxidation processes. The greatest potential of MFC lies in the use of wastewater as a substrate (fuel), which allows combining waste treatment and energy recovery. Recently, a development has been initiated that expands the scope of these bioelectrochemical systems from power generation to an increasing number of further applications. This development has become possible by the introduction of new cathode catalyst concepts. The corresponding devices, here summarized as MXCs--the X standing for the different types and applications--share one common element: the microbial anode. The cathode, however, has to fulfil rather different tasks and thus differs quite remarkably across these systems. In this critical review we analyze the different cathode tasks and the resulting requirements for the respective cathode and discuss the available catalyst options in the light of their major advantages and weaknesses. These catalyst options comprise inorganic, biomolecular as well microbial catalyst systems. Hereby, special emphasis is put on a comparative analysis of chemical and biological cathodes and their individual potentials and limitations. For this purpose, criteria are defined based on relevant properties (performance, price, longevity, etc.) and are evaluated by means of a multi-factor analysis, based on the individual target reaction and catalyst. This analysis is exemplarily elaborated for the oxygen reduction reaction (typical for MFCs) and for the hydrogen production (in MECs) (91 references).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria
Thauer, R. K., Jungermann, K., & Decker, K. (1977) · Bacteriological Reviews · doi:10.1128/br.41.1.100-180.1977 · Cited by 4,146
Biomimetic Hydrogen Evolution: MoS 2 Nanoparticles as Catalyst for Hydrogen Evolution
Hinnemann, B., Moses, P. G., Bonde, J., Jørgensen, K. P., Nielsen, J. H., Horch, S., Chorkendorff, I., & Nørskov, J. K. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0504690 · Cited by 4,065
Cited by
Palladium alloys used as electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction
Wang, T., Chutia, A., Brett, D. J. L., Shearing, P. R., He, G., Chai, G., & Parkin, I. P. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee03915b · Cited by 322
Tang, J., Chen, S., Yuan, Y., Cai, X., & Zhou, S. (2015) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2015.04.074 · Cited by 110
Wang, W.-K., Tang, B., Liu, J., Shi, H., Xu, Q., & Zhao, G. (2019) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2019.02.099 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Harnisch, F., & Schröder, U.
- Venue
- Chemical Society Reviews
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4433
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W2067696785
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From MFC to MXC: chemical and biological cathodes and their potential for microbial bioelectrochemical systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c003068f
- The paper
- Harnisch, F., & Schröder, U. (2010). From MFC to MXC: chemical and biological cathodes and their potential for microbial bioelectrochemical systems. Chemical Society Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1039/c003068f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.