The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Redox models in chemistry textbooks for the upper secondary school: friend or foe?
Open accessAbstract
We have investigated how chemistry textbooks use models of redox reactions in different subject areas, how they change models between and within the topics, and how they deal with specific learning difficulties identified in the literature. The textbooks examined were published for use in the natural science programme in Swedish upper secondary schools and in the UK A-level course. As a starting point, the defined redox models found in the literature were used to investigate the textbooks. The results show that all redox models are used with the addition of alternative representations. Authors exclusively use the electron and the oxidation number models in inorganic chemistry. In organic chemistry, the oxygen and hydrogen model are used, and in biochemistry mainly hydrogen and alternative representations. There is no guide to changes of models between the subject areas. However, within the inorganic chemistry, authors guide model change which was not identified in either organic or biochemistry. Regarding the learning difficulties, the authors dealt with just a few of them.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research reports that conceptual difficulties, alternative conceptions, and even the use of inappropriate language and misleading visual representations in textbooks occur.
“Research reports those conceptual difficulties, alternative conceptions, and even the use of inappropriate language and misleading visual representations in textbooks occur (Schmidt et al., 2007; Barke et al., 2009; Österlund et al., 2010).”
From An analysis of the visual representation of redox reactions and related content in Brazilian secondary school chemistry textbooks (2020) · cites this paper as Österlund et al., 2010
A fundamental aspect about the teaching of redox processes that lead to alternative conceptions is the coexistence of several explanatory models, which sometimes is confused by students, teachers, and even authors of textbooks.
“A fundamental aspect about the teaching of redox processes that lead to alternative conceptions is the coexistence of several explanatory models, which sometimes is confused by students, teachers, and even authors of textbooks (Österlund et al., 2010).”
From An analysis of the visual representation of redox reactions and related content in Brazilian secondary school chemistry textbooks (2020) · cites this paper as Österlund et al., 2010
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Österlund, L.-L., Berg, A., & Ekborg, M.
- Affiliations
- Umeå University (SE)
- Malmö University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Österlund, Lise-Lotte
- Venue
- Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 182-192
- ISSN
- 1109-4028 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-1108
- OpenAlex
- W2007805077
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- urn.kb.se
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Chemistry Education Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
- DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Chemistry Education and Research
- Social Sciences › Education › Various Chemistry Research Topics
- Keywords
- redox reactions, chemistry textbook, textbook analysis, upper secondary school, electron transfer model, inorganic chemistry, organic chemistry, learning difficulties, alternative representations, A-level chemistry, Swedish upper secondary school
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review