Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 481

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Highly selective detection of phosphate in very complicated matrixes with an off–on fluorescent probe of europium-adjusted carbon dots

Zhao, Heng Xin, Liu, Li Qin, Liu, Zhong De, Wang, Yi, Zhao, Xi Juan, Huang, Cheng Zhi·2011·Chemical Communications

Abstract

A simple method for phosphate (Pi) detection is established by developing an off-on fluorescence probe of europium-adjusted carbon dots (CDs), which has been successfully applied to the detection of Pi in very complicated matrixes such as artificial wetlands system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c0cc04399k

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 481

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, H. X., Liu, L. Q., Liu, Z. D., Wang, Y., Zhao, X. J., & Huang, C. Z.
Venue
Chemical Communications
Published
2011
Volume
47
Issue
9
Pages
2604
ISSN
  • 1359-7345 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-548X
OpenAlex
W2166721933
Cited by
481
References
0
FWCI
15.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly selective detection of phosphate in very complicated matrixes with an off–on fluorescent probe of europium-adjusted carbon dots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c0cc04399k
The paper
Zhao, H. X., Liu, L. Q., Liu, Z. D., Wang, Y., Zhao, X. J., & Huang, C. Z. (2011). Highly selective detection of phosphate in very complicated matrixes with an off–on fluorescent probe of europium-adjusted carbon dots. Chemical Communications. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cc04399k

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.