The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Empirical force fields for complex hydrated calcio-silicate layered materials
Abstract
The use of empirical force fields is now a standard approach in predicting the properties of hydrated oxides which are omnipresent in both natural and engineering applications. Transferability of force fields to analogous hydrated oxides without rigorous investigations may result in misleading property predictions. Herein, we focus on two common empirical force fields, the simple point charge ClayFF potential and the core-shell potential to study tobermorite minerals, the most prominent family of Calcium-Silicate-Hydrates that are complex hydrated oxides. We benchmark the predictive capabilities of these force fields against first principles results. While the structural information seem to be in close agreement with DFT results, we find that for higher order properties such as elastic constants, the core-shell potential quantitatively improves upon the simple point charge model, and shows a larger degree of transferability to complex materials. In return, to remedy the deficiencies of the simple point charge potential for hydrated calcio-silicates, we suggest using both structural data and elasticity data for potential calibration, a new force field potential, CSH-FF. This re-parameterized version of ClayFF is then applied to simulating an atomistic model of cement (Pellenq et al., PNAS, 2009). We demonstrate that this force field improves the predictive capabilities of ClayFF, being considerably less computational intensive than the core-shell model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Youssef, M., Pellenq, R. J.-M., & Yildiz, B. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja107003a · Cited by 284
Self-citationQomi, M. J. A., Bauchy, M., Ulm, F.-J., & Pellenq, R. J.-M. (2014) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4864118 · Cited by 153
Self-citationEffective Interactions between Calcium-Silicate-Hydrate Nanolayers
Masoumi, S., Zare, S., Valipour, H., & Abdolhosseini Qomi, M. J. (2019) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b08146 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Shahsavari, R., Pellenq, R. J.-M., & Ulm, F.-J.
- Venue
- Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1002-1011
- ISSN
- 1463-9076 (ISSN-L)
- 1463-9084
- OpenAlex
- W2020133053
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Empirical force fields for complex hydrated calcio-silicate layered materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c0cp00516a
- The paper
- Shahsavari, R., Pellenq, R. J.-M., & Ulm, F.-J. (2011). Empirical force fields for complex hydrated calcio-silicate layered materials. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp00516a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.