The DOI matches its Crossref record.
HOx radical regeneration in isoprene oxidation via peroxy radical isomerisations. II: experimental evidence and global impact
Abstract
A consistent body of experimental evidence from work of other groups is presented in support of the novel, theoretically based, isoprene oxidation mechanism we recently proposed to rationalize the unexpectedly high OH concentrations observed over areas with high isoprene emissions. Some explicit or implicit criticisms on the new mechanism are addressed. A particular photochemical mechanism is newly proposed for the OH-regenerating photolysis of the crucial hydroperoxy-methyl-butenals (HPALDs), formed by isomerisation of the initial isoprene hydroxy-peroxy radicals, that rationalizes a quantum yield close to 1. A similar photolysis mechanism of the resulting photolabile peroxy-acid-aldehydes (PACALDs) is shown to generate ample additional OH. Global modeling demonstrates the major importance of the new chemistry for the oxidizing capacity of the atmosphere over continents. The globally averaged yield of the HPALDs in the oxidation of isoprene by OH is estimated to be of the order of 0.6. The isomerisation reactions of isoprene peroxy radicals are found to result in modelled [OH] increases in the planetary boundary layer by up to a factor of 3, in agreement with the reported observations as in the Amazon basin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Molecular Identification of Organic Compounds in the Atmosphere: State of the Art and Challenges
Nozière, B., Kalberer, M., Claeys, M., Allan, J., D’Anna, B., Decesari, S., Finessi, E., Glasius, M., Grgić, I., Hamilton, J. F., et al. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5003485 · Cited by 656
The MCM v3.3.1 degradation scheme for isoprene
Jenkin, M. E., Young, J. C., & Rickard, A. R. (2015) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-15-11433-2015 · Cited by 623
Tropospheric OH and HO2 radicals: field measurements and model comparisons
Stone, D., Whalley, L. K., & Heard, D. E. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs35140d · Cited by 599
Why do models overestimate surface ozone in the Southeast United States?
Travis, K. R., Jacob, D. J., Fisher, J. A., Kim, P. S., Marais, E. A., Zhu, L., Yu, K., Miller, C. C., Yantosca, R. M., Sulprizio, M. P., et al. (2016) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-16-13561-2016 · Cited by 470
Key chemical NO x sink uncertainties and how they influence top-down emissions of nitrogen oxides
Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., Boersma, K. F., van der A, R. J., Kurokawa, J., Ohara, T., & Zhang, Q. (2013) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-13-9057-2013 · Cited by 190
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Peeters, J., & Müller, J.-F.
- Venue
- Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 14227
- ISSN
- 1463-9076 (ISSN-L)
- 1463-9084
- OpenAlex
- W2082035655
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HOx radical regeneration in isoprene oxidation via peroxy radical isomerisations. II: experimental evidence and global impact. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c0cp00811g
- The paper
- Peeters, J., & Müller, J.-F. (2010). HOx radical regeneration in isoprene oxidation via peroxy radical isomerisations. II: experimental evidence and global impact. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp00811g
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.