Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Retracted article: Towards near zero-sulfur liquid fuels: a perspective review

Pawelec, Barbara, Navarro, Rufino M., Campos-Martin, José Miguel, Fierro, José L. G.·2011·Catalysis Science & Technology

Abstract

We, the named authors, hereby wholly retract this Catalysis Science & Technology article, due to significant similarity with previously published work. Signed: B. Pawelec, R. M. Navarro, J. M. Campos-Martin and J. L. G. Fierro, October 2012. Retraction endorsed by Jamie Humphrey, Editor, Catalysis Science & Technology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c0cy00049cThis paper is marked retracted.

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Pawelec, B., Navarro, R. M., Campos-Martin, J. M., & Fierro, J. L. G.
Venue
Catalysis Science & Technology
Published
2011
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
23
ISSN
  • 2044-4753 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-4761
OpenAlex
W2104041826
Cited by
265
References
0
FWCI
47.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retracted article: Towards near zero-sulfur liquid fuels: a perspective review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c0cy00049c
The paper
Pawelec, B., Navarro, R. M., Campos-Martin, J. M., & Fierro, J. L. G. (2011). Retracted article: Towards near zero-sulfur liquid fuels: a perspective review. Catalysis Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cy00049c

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.