Cited by 172Subcritical and Supercritical Water ProcessesThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies

Catalytic treatment of crude algal bio-oil in supercritical water: optimization studies

Duan, Peigao, Savage, Phillip E.·2011·Energy & Environmental Science

Abstract

We have investigated the catalytic treatment of a crude algal liquefaction bio-oil in supercritical water to discover how the properties of the treated oil depend on the experimental conditions. An L9 (34) orthogonal array design (OAD) with four factors at three levels was employed. The four factors were temperature (varied from 430–530 °C), time (varied from 2–6 h), catalyst type (Pt/C, Mo2C, HZSM-5), and catalyst loading (varied from 5–20 wt%). We used a direct analysis to determine the relationship between experimental conditions and properties of treated oils. The oil properties we examined were elemental composition, atomic ratios, chemical composition, and higher heating value. Of the four factors, the 100 °C variation in temperature was always the most influential for each of the oil properties examined. Of the remaining three factors, catalyst type had the greatest influence on the fatty acid content of the treated oil and the fraction of N- and O-containing compounds in the oil. Catalyst loading had the greatest effect on the higher heating value and O/C ratio in the treated oil. Reaction time had the greatest effect on the H/C and N/C ratios. The results demonstrated that treatment in supercritical water at 430 °C led to roughly a halving of the N and O content of the oil, a reduction in S to below detection limits, and about a 10% improvement in the higher heating value of the bio-oil. Within the parameter space investigated, the conditions leading to the highest content of saturated compounds in the treated oil are 430 °C, 6 h, with a 10 wt% loading of Mo2C as the catalyst. Around 76 wt% of the carbon in the feedstock was retained in the treated oil at these conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c0ee00343c

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 172

Authors
Duan, P., & Savage, P. E.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Savage, Phillip E.
Venue
Energy & Environmental Science
Published
2011
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
1447
ISSN
  • 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-5706
OpenAlex
W2081026966
Cited by
172
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Energy & Environmental Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Michigan
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
Keywords
supercritical water treatment, catalytic upgrading, Mo2C catalyst, Pt/C catalyst, HZSM-5 zeolite, catalyst loading, reaction temperature, higher heating value, fatty acid content, elemental composition, process optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review