The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ultra-fine cellulose nanofibers: new nano-scale materials for water purification
Abstract
The major challenges in membrane technology for water filtration are the development of new materials (e.g. high durability, low cost and low environmental concerns) and new structures (e.g. directed water channels) that can produce high permeation flux (thus low energy input) while maintaining a high selectivity or rejection rate. This highlight discusses the utilization of ultra-fine cellulose nanofibers (UCN, diameter 5–10 nm), made by TEMPO/NaBr/NaClO oxidation of natural cellulose (e.g. wood pulp), in different nanofibrous composite formats that can meet this challenge for microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) applications. The unique features of ultra-fine cellulose nanofibers include small diameter, high surface-to-volume ratio, easy surface functionality, good mechanical properties and good chemical resistance. The electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds with fine pore size defined by the fiber diameter could be used to remove waterborne bacteria at two to three times higher flux when compared to that of commercial MF membranes (e.g., Millipore GS9035). When UCN were used as a functionalized adsorbent infused in the asymmetric two-layered non-woven fibrous format, the membranes exhibited a high ability to remove bacteria (by size exclusion) and viruses (by adsorption) simultaneously. When UCN were used as the barrier layer in an asymmetric three-layered non-woven fibrous format containing fibers of different diameters (from 5 nm to 20 µm), the membranes exhibited a two- to ten-fold increase in permeation flux over commercial membranes for ultrafiltration of oil and water emulsions (e.g., for purification of bilge water in ships or industrially produced water).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications
Habibi, Y., Lucia, L. A., & Rojas, O. J. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900339w · Cited by 5,980
Saito, T., Nishiyama, Y., Putaux, J.-L., Vignon, M., & Isogai, A. (2006) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm060154s · Cited by 1,796
Cited by
Wood-Derived Materials for Green Electronics, Biological Devices, and Energy Applications
Zhu, H., Luo, W., Ciesielski, P. N., Fang, Z., Zhu, J. Y., Henriksson, G., Himmel, M. E., & Hu, L. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00225 · Cited by 1,532
Nanofibrous microfiltration membranes capable of removing bacteria, viruses and heavy metal ions
Wang, R., Guan, S., Sato, A., Wang, X., Wang, Z., Yang, R., Hsiao, B. S., & Chu, B. (2013) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2013.06.020 · Cited by 260
Self-citationTwo step and one step preparation of porous nanocomposite cellulose membranes doped with TiO 2
Wittmar, A., Vorat, D., & Ulbricht, M. (2015) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c5ra16337d · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, H., Burger, C., Hsiao, B. S., & Chu, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Chemistry
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 7507
- ISSN
- 0959-9428 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2150927074
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultra-fine cellulose nanofibers: new nano-scale materials for water purification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c0jm04308g
- The paper
- Ma, H., Burger, C., Hsiao, B. S., & Chu, B. (2011). Ultra-fine cellulose nanofibers: new nano-scale materials for water purification. Journal of Materials Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm04308g
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.