Cited by 153Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient electrocatalytic oxygen reduction over metal free-nitrogen doped carbon nanocapsules

Shanmugam, Sangaraju, Osaka, Tetsuya·2011·Chemical Communications

Abstract

Nitrogen doped carbon nanocapsules (NCNCs) were synthesized as a non-noble electrocatalyst for the ORR using a simple and efficient route. The NCNCs exhibited higher activity than the commercial Pt/C catalyst, excellent stability, and resistance to methanol oxidation in the oxygen reduction reaction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c1cc10361j

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Lefevre, 2009, Science, 324, 71, 10.1126/science.1170051 · DOI
  2. Tominaka, 2008, Electrochim. Acta, 53, 4679, 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.01.069 · DOI
  3. Yu, 2007, J. Power Sources, 172, 133, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.049 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Zhou, 2010, Energy Environ. Sci., 3, 1437, 10.1039/c003710a · DOI
  5. Sun, 2005, Chem. Mater., 17, 3749, 10.1021/cm050107r · DOI
  6. Gong, 2009, Science, 323, 760, 10.1126/science.1168049 · DOI
  7. Liu, 2010, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 49, 2565, 10.1002/anie.200907289 · DOI
  8. Maldonado, 2005, J. Phys. Chem. B, 109, 4707, 10.1021/jp044442z · DOI
  9. Yu, 2010, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 1, 2165, 10.1021/jz100533t · DOI
  10. Roy, 1997, J. Electrochem. Soc., 144, 2323, 10.1149/1.1837812 · DOI
  11. Maiyalagan, 2005, Mater. Chem. Phys., 93, 291, 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.03.039 · DOI
  12. Allen, 2008, ACS Nano, 2, 1914, 10.1021/nn800355v · DOI
  13. Lim, 2009, Langmuir, 25, 8268, 10.1021/la900472d · DOI
  14. Chen, 2010, Carbon, 48, 3057, 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.04.038 · DOI
  15. Shanmugam, 2006, J. Phys. Chem. B, 110, 2037, 10.1021/jp055749g · DOI
  16. Liu, 2009, Appl. Catal., B, 93, 156, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.09.025 · DOI
  17. Chen, 2008, J. Phys. Chem. C, 112, 3891, 10.1021/jp7110204 · DOI
  18. Sasaki, 2008, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 10, 159, 10.1039/B709893F · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shanmugam, S., & Osaka, T.
Affiliations
Waseda University (JP)
Corresponding author
Shanmugam, Sangaraju
Venue
Chemical Communications
Published
2011
Volume
47
Issue
15
Pages
4463
ISSN
  • 1359-7345 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-548X
OpenAlex
W1976143611
Cited by
153
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 19
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemical Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
oxygen reduction reaction, metal-free electrocatalysts, non-noble metal catalysts, carbon nanocapsules, methanol tolerance, catalyst stability, Pt/C comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review