Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pt(iv) analogs of oxaliplatin that do not follow the expected correlation between electrochemical reduction potential and rate of reduction by ascorbate

Zhang, Jenny Z., Wexselblatt, Ezequiel, Hambley, Trevor W., Gibson, Dan·2012·Chem. Commun.
DOI 10.1039/c1cc16647f
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In contrast to the Pt(IV) derivatives of cisplatin, Pt(IV) derivatives of oxaliplatin do not show the expected correlation between the electrochemical reduction potentials and rates of reduction by ascorbate. This is probably due to the lower ability of the amine and carboxylato ligands to form a bridge with the reducing agents to facilitate electron transfer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c1cc16647f

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, J. Z., Wexselblatt, E., Hambley, T. W., & Gibson, D.
Venue
Chem. Commun.
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2012
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
847-849
ISSN
  • 1359-7345 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-548X
DOI
10.1039/c1cc16647f
OpenAlex
W2028871771
Cited by
190
References
0
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pt(iv) analogs of oxaliplatin that do not follow the expected correlation between electrochemical reduction potential and rate of reduction by ascorbate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1cc16647f
The paper
Zhang, J. Z., Wexselblatt, E., Hambley, T. W., & Gibson, D. (2012). Pt(iv) analogs of oxaliplatin that do not follow the expected correlation between electrochemical reduction potential and rate of reduction by ascorbate. Chem. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cc16647f

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.