The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Homogeneous ice nucleation from supercooled water
Abstract
Homogeneous ice nucleation from supercooled water was studied in the temperature range of 220-240 K through combining the forward flux sampling method (Allen et al., J. Chem. Phys., 2006, 124, 024102) with molecular dynamics simulations (FFS/MD), based on a recently developed coarse-grained water model (mW) (Molinero et al., J. Phys. Chem. B, 2009, 113, 4008). The calculated ice nucleation rates display a strong temperature dependence, ranging from 2.148 ± 0.635 × 10(25) m(-3) s(-1) at 220 K to 1.672 ± 0.970 × 10(-7) m(-3) s(-1) at 240 K. These rates can be fitted according to the classical nucleation theory, yielding an estimate of the effective ice-water interface energy γ(ls) of 31.01 ± 0.21 mJ m(-2) for the mW water model. Compared to experiments, our calculation underestimates the homogeneous ice nucleation rate by a few orders of magnitude. Possible reasons for the discrepancy are discussed. The nucleating ice embryo contains both cubic ice Ic and hexagonal ice Ih, with the fraction of each structure being roughly 50% when the critical size is reached. In particular, a novel defect structure containing nearly five-fold twin boundaries is identified in the ice clusters formed during nucleation. The way such defect structure is formed is found to be different from mechanisms proposed for the formation of the same defect in metallic nanoparticles and thin film. The quasi five-fold twin boundary structure found here is expected to occur in the crystallization of a wide range of materials with the diamond cubic structure, including ice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
T RANSITION P ATH S AMPLING : Throwing Ropes Over Rough Mountain Passes, in the Dark
Bolhuis, P. G., Chandler, D., Dellago, C., & Geissler, P. L. (2002) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.53.082301.113146 · Cited by 1,972
Cited by
A Review of Classical and Nonclassical Nucleation Theories
Karthika, S., Radhakrishnan, T. K., & Kalaichelvi, P. (2016) · Crystal Growth & Design · doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.6b00794 · Cited by 868
Homogeneous Ice Nucleation at Moderate Supercooling from Molecular Simulation
Sanz, E., Vega, C., Espinosa, J. R., Caballero-Bernal, R., Abascal, J. L. F., & Valeriani, C. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja4028814 · Cited by 334
Němec, T. (2013) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2013.07.085 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, T., Donadio, D., Russo, G., & Galli, G.
- Venue
- Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- 19807
- ISSN
- 1463-9076 (ISSN-L)
- 1463-9084
- OpenAlex
- W2020109314
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Homogeneous ice nucleation from supercooled water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1cp22167a
- The paper
- Li, T., Donadio, D., Russo, G., & Galli, G. (2011). Homogeneous ice nucleation from supercooled water. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cp22167a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.