The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Locked vs. unlocked nucleic acids (LNA vs. UNA): contrasting structures work towards common therapeutic goals
Abstract
Oligonucleotide chemistry has been developed greatly over the past three decades, with many advances in increasing nuclease resistance, enhancing duplex stability and assisting with cellular uptake. Locked nucleic acid (LNA) is a structurally rigid modification that increases the binding affinity of a modified-oligonucleotide. In contrast, unlocked nucleic acid (UNA) is a highly flexible modification, which can be used to modulate duplex characteristics. In this tutorial review, we will compare the synthetic routes to both of these modifications, contrast the structural features, examine the hybridization properties of LNA and UNA modified duplexes, and discuss how they have been applied within biotechnology and drug research. LNA has found widespread use in antisense oligonucleotide technology, where it can stabilize interactions with target RNA and protect from cellular nucleases. The newly emerging field of siRNAs has made use of LNA and, recently, also UNA. These modifications are able to increase double-stranded RNA stability in serum and decrease off-target effects seen with conventional siRNAs. LNA and UNA are also emerging as versatile modifications for aptamers. Their application to known aptamer structures has opened up the possibility of future selection of LNA-modified aptamers. Each of these oligonucleotide technologies has the potential to become a new type of therapy to treat a wide variety of diseases, and LNA and UNA will no doubt play a part in future developments of therapeutic and diagnostic oligonucleotides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LNA-mediated microRNA silencing in non-human primates
Elmén, J., Lindow, M., Schütz, S., Lawrence, M., Petri, A., Obad, S., Lindholm, M., Hedtjärn, M., Hansen, H. F., Berger, U., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06783 · Cited by 1,589
A general purpose RNA-cleaving DNA enzyme
Santoro, S. W., & Joyce, G. F. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.9.4262 · Cited by 1,541
Killing the messenger: short RNAs that silence gene expression
Dykxhoorn, D. M., Novina, C. D., & Sharp, P. A. (2003) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1129 · Cited by 1,182
Koshkin, A. A., Singh, S. K., Nielsen, P., Rajwanshi, V. K., Kumar, R., Meldgaard, M., Olsen, C. E., & Wengel, J. (1998) · Tetrahedron · doi:10.1016/s0040-4020(98)00094-5 · Cited by 1,047
Self-citationAntisense technologies: Improvement through novel chemical modifications
Kurreck, J. (2003) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03555.x · Cited by 1,006
siRNAs: applications in functional genomics and potential as therapeutics
Dorsett, Y., & Tuschl, T. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1345 · Cited by 909
Antisense oligonucleotides: basic concepts and mechanisms.
Dias, N., & Stein, C. A. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 759
Obika, S., Nanbu, D., Hari, Y., Andoh, J.-I., Morio, K.-I., Doi, T., & Imanishi, T. (1998) · Tetrahedron Letters · doi:10.1016/s0040-4039(98)01084-3 · Cited by 700
Freier, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.22.4429 · Cited by 692
Obika, S., Nanbu, D., Hari, Y., Morio, K.-I., In, Y., Ishida, T., & Imanishi, T. (1997) · Tetrahedron Letters · doi:10.1016/s0040-4039(97)10322-7 · Cited by 610
Cited by
The delivery of therapeutic oligonucleotides
Juliano, R. L. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw236 · Cited by 854
Chemistry, structure and function of approved oligonucleotide therapeutics
Egli, M., & Manoharan, M. (2023) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad067 · Cited by 828
Synthetic genetic polymers capable of heredity and evolution
Pinheiro, V. B., Taylor, A. I., Cozens, C., Abramov, M., Renders, M., Zhang, S., Chaput, J. C., Wengel, J., Peak-Chew, S.-Y., McLaughlin, S. H., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1217622 · Cited by 730
Self-citationSplice-switching antisense oligonucleotides as therapeutic drugs
Havens, M. A., & Hastings, M. L. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw533 · Cited by 538
Chemistries for DNA Nanotechnology
Madsen, M., & Gothelf, K. V. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00570 · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, M. A., & Wengel, J.
- Venue
- Chemical Society Reviews
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5680
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W1982559804
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Locked vs. unlocked nucleic acids (LNA vs. UNA): contrasting structures work towards common therapeutic goals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1cs15048k
- The paper
- Campbell, M. A., & Wengel, J. (2011). Locked vs. unlocked nucleic acids (LNA vs. UNA): contrasting structures work towards common therapeutic goals. Chemical Society Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cs15048k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.