Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Production of furfural and carboxylic acids from waste aqueous hemicellulose solutions from the pulp and paper and cellulosic ethanol industries

Open access
Xing, Rong, Qi, Wei, Huber, George W.·2011·Energy & Environmental Science

Abstract

In this paper we present a new process to produce furfural and co-products of formic and acetic acids from waste aqueous hemicellulose solutions using a continuous two zone biphasic reactor. We estimate this approach uses 67% to 80% less energy than the current industrial processes to produce furfural. An economic analysis indicates that furfural can be produced with this process at 366 US$ per metric ton which is 25% of the selling price of furfural in the U.S. market today. This analysis assumes a plant capacity of 78 kiloton per year of furfural, 12 kiloton per year of formic acid and 44 kiloton per year of acetic acid (processing 160 ton per hour of hemicellulose solutions with a xylose concentration of 10.7 wt%) and is based on the data collected in this paper. Formic acid and acetic acid are probably produced from the acid hydrolysis of formylated and acetylated xylose oligomers, respectively. Furfural is produced in a two-step process consisting of the hydrolysis of xylose oligomers followed by the dehydration of xylose monomers and then extraction of the furfural into an organic solvent. Two types of hemicellulose solutions were used as the feedstock including a hot water extract and a green liquor extract derived from Northeastern hardwood trees. The hemicellulose solution contains mainly xylose oligomers as well as glucose, arabinose, lactic acid, acetic acid, formic acid, and other minor products. We found that the reaction temperature, the space velocity, the volumetric organic to aqueous phase ratio, and the acid concentration have significant effects on the furfural production. Under the optimized condition, a furfural yield of 90% can be achieved in the reactor from the hot water extract containing 10.7 wt% xylose. A conceptual design is performed for the integration of the production of furfural, formic and acetic acids, the liquid–liquid split, and subsequent three-stage distillations. We demonstrate that high purity (>99%) of furfural, formic and acetic acids can be obtained, with a final recovery of more than 97%, 56%, and 88% of the furfural, formic acid and acetic acid, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c1ee01022k

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
Xing, R., Qi, W., & Huber, G. W.
Venue
Energy & Environmental Science
Published
2011
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
2193
ISSN
  • 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-5706
OpenAlex
W2019588311
Cited by
345
References
1
FWCI
17.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.