Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 774

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What is the choice for supercapacitors: graphene or graphene oxide?

Xu, Bin, Yue, Shufang, Sui, Zhuyin, Zhang, Xuetong, Hou, Shanshan, Cao, Gaoping, Yang, Yusheng·2011·Energy & Environmental Science

Abstract

Graphene oxide, an intermediate during graphene synthesis by a modified Hummers's method, exhibits higher capacitance, up to 189 F g−1, than graphene due to an additional pseudo-capacitance effect of attached oxygen-containing functional groups on its basal planes. Taking its higher capacitance, lower cost and shorter processing time into consideration, graphene oxide may be a better choice than graphene as an electrode material for supercapacitors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c1ee01198g

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 774

Metadata

Authors
Xu, B., Yue, S., Sui, Z., Zhang, X., Hou, S., Cao, G., & Yang, Y.
Venue
Energy & Environmental Science
Published
2011
Volume
4
Issue
8
Pages
2826
ISSN
  • 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-5706
OpenAlex
W2146520657
Cited by
774
References
37
FWCI
18.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What is the choice for supercapacitors: graphene or graphene oxide? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1ee01198g
The paper
Xu, B., Yue, S., Sui, Z., Zhang, X., Hou, S., Cao, G., & Yang, Y. (2011). What is the choice for supercapacitors: graphene or graphene oxide? Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ee01198g

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.