The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organic solar cells: A new look at traditional models
Abstract
Traditional inorganic solar cell models, originating with the work of Shockley, are widely used in understanding bulk heterojunction (BHJ) organic solar cell response (organic solar cells are also referred to as organic photovoltaics, or OPVs). While these models can be useful, there are several key points of departure from traditional solar cell behavior. In this Perspective, we discuss three important areas: (1) geminate pair and bimolecular recombination, (2) effects of interfacial layers inserted between the electrodes and active layer, and (3) resistance effects. Since organic solar cell materials typically have large Coulombic exciton binding energies (e.g., ∼0.3–0.5 eV), limited dissociation of photogenerated charge carriers can be a significant limitation in these cells that is not observed in traditional silicon solar cells. Additionally, the active layer morphology of BHJ organic solar cells allows free charge carriers to recombine before extraction from the cell, creating another photocurrent loss mechanism. Interfacial layers serve a unique role in BHJ organic solar cells; in addition to conventional functions such as photon transmission and charge injection, interfacial layers often act as “blocking” layers, ensuring that charge carriers are collected at their respective electrodes (i.e., electrons at the cathode and holes at the anode). Additionally, resistance effects in organic solar cells differ from traditional models in both field and cell area dependencies. Organic semiconductor mobilities and charge densities exhibit significant sensitivity to field strength, with mobility varying by ∼10x over typical cell voltage test ranges (1 V). This creates the need for alternative models to describe cell internal resistance. Finally, resistance losses are also sensitive to cell area, due to the limited conductivities of the transparent electrode materials used. Therefore, accommodation of the above deviations from traditional models is imperative for the design and synthesis of new generation high efficiency organic solar cell materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fill factor in organic solar cells
Qi, B., & Wang, J. (2013) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c3cp51383a · Cited by 732
Morphology characterization in organic and hybrid solar cells
Chen, W., Nikiforov, M. P., & Darling, S. B. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee22056c · Cited by 400
Exploration of Near-Infrared Organic Photodetectors
Li, Q., Guo, Y., & Liu, Y. (2019) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00966 · Cited by 328
Takacs, C. J., Sun, Y., Welch, G. C., Perez, L. A., Liu, X., Wen, W., Bazan, G. C., & Heeger, A. J. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja3050713 · Cited by 320
Small-Bandgap Semiconducting Polymers with High Near-Infrared Photoresponse
Hendriks, K. H., Li, W., Wienk, M. M., & Janssen, R. A. J. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja506265h · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Servaites, J. D., Ratner, M. A., & Marks, T. J.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4410
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2113386068
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organic solar cells: A new look at traditional models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1ee01663f
- The paper
- Servaites, J. D., Ratner, M. A., & Marks, T. J. (2011). Organic solar cells: A new look at traditional models. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ee01663f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.