Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-throughput combinatorial cell co-culture using microfluidics

Tumarkin, Ethan, Tzadu, Lsan, Csaszar, Elizabeth, Seo, Minseok, Zhang, Hong, Lee, Anna, Peerani, Raheem, Purpura, Kelly, Zandstra, Peter W., Kumacheva, Eugenia·2011·Integrative Biology

Abstract

Co-culture strategies are foundational in cell biology. These systems, which serve as mimics of in vivo tissue niches, are typically poorly defined in terms of cell ratios, local cues and supportive cell-cell interactions. In the stem cell niche, the ability to screen cell-cell interactions and identify local supportive microenvironments has a broad range of applications in transplantation, tissue engineering and wound healing. We present a microfluidic platform for the high-throughput generation of hydrogel microbeads for cell co-culture. Encapsulation of different cell populations in microgels was achieved by introducing in a microfluidic device two streams of distinct cell suspensions, emulsifying the mixed suspension, and gelling the precursor droplets. The cellular composition in the microgels was controlled by varying the volumetric flow rates of the corresponding streams. We demonstrate one of the applications of the microfluidic method by co-encapsulating factor-dependent and responsive blood progenitor cell lines (MBA2 and M07e cells, respectively) at varying ratios, and show that in-bead paracrine secretion can modulate the viability of the factor dependent cells. Furthermore, we show the application of the method as a tool to screen the impact of specific growth factors on a primary human heterogeneous cell population. Co-encapsulation of IL-3 secreting MBA2 cells with umbilical cord blood cells revealed differential sub-population responsiveness to paracrine signals (CD14+ cells were particularly responsive to locally delivered IL-3). This microfluidic co-culture platform should enable high throughput screening of cell co-culture conditions, leading to new strategies to manipulate cell fate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c1ib00002k

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
Tumarkin, E., Tzadu, L., Csaszar, E., Seo, M., Zhang, H., Lee, A., Peerani, R., Purpura, K., Zandstra, P. W., & Kumacheva, E.
Venue
Integrative Biology
Published
2011
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
653
ISSN
  • 1757-9694 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-9708
OpenAlex
W2093846636
Cited by
192
References
1
FWCI
11.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-throughput combinatorial cell co-culture using microfluidics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1ib00002k
The paper
Tumarkin, E., Tzadu, L., Csaszar, E., Seo, M., Zhang, H., Lee, A., Peerani, R., Purpura, K., Zandstra, P. W., & Kumacheva, E. (2011). High-throughput combinatorial cell co-culture using microfluidics. Integrative Biology. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ib00002k

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.