Cited by 221Heavy Metal Exposure and ToxicitySmoking Behavior and CessationAsthma and respiratory diseases

Toxic elements in tobacco and in cigarette smoke: inflammation and sensitization

Open access
Pappas, R. Steve·2011·Metallomics

Abstract

Biochemically and pathologically, there is strong evidence for both atopic and nonatopic airway sensitization, hyperresponsiveness, and inflammation as a consequence of exposure to tobacco mainstream or sidestream smoke particulate. There is growing evidence for the relation between exposure to mainstream and sidestream smoke and diseases resulting from reactive oxidant challenge and inflammation directly as a consequence of the combined activity of neutrophils, macrophages, dendritic cells, eosinophils, basophils, as a humoral immunological consequence of sensitization, and that the metal components of the particulate play a role in adjuvant effects. As an end consequence, carcinogenicity is a known outcome of chronic inflammation. Smokeless tobacco has been evaluated by the IARC as a group 1 carcinogen. Of the many harmful constituents in smokeless tobacco, oral tissue metallothionein gradients suggest that metals contribute to the toxicity from smokeless tobacco use and possibly sensitization. This work reviews and examines work on probable contributions of toxic metals from tobacco and smoke to pathology observed as a consequence of smoking and the use of smokeless tobacco.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c1mt00066g

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cigarette smoke may contribute to the concentration of aluminium in the air.

    “Cigarette smoke may contribute to the concentration of Al in the air (Exley et al., 2006; Kazi et al., 2009; Pappas, 2011; Afridi et al., 2015).”

    From Aluminium toxicosis: a review of toxic actions and effects (2019) · cites this paper as Pappas, 2011

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 204 · Cited by 221

Authors
Pappas, R. S.
Venue
Metallomics
Published
2011
Volume
3
Issue
11
Pages
1181
ISSN
  • 1756-5901 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-591X
OpenAlex
W2129244211
Cited by
221
References
204
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Metallomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
toxic metals, tobacco smoke, smokeless tobacco, airway inflammation, airway sensitization, hyperreactivity, metallothionein, neutrophils, eosinophils, dendritic cells, carcinogenesis, oxidative stress
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Immunization, Inflammation, Lung Diseases, Metals, Smoke, Smoking, Nicotiana, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Tobacco, Smokeless, Inhalation Exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review