The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Facile magnetization of metal–organic framework MIL-101 for magnetic solid-phase extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in environmental water samples
Abstract
The unusual properties such as high surface area, good thermal stability, uniform structured nanoscale cavities and the availability of in-pore functionality and outer-surface modification make metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) attractive for diverse analytical applications. However, integration of MOFs with magnets for magnetic solid-phase extraction for analytical application has not been attempted so far. Here we show a facile magnetization of MOF MIL-101(Cr) for rapid magnetic solid-phase extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from environmental water samples. MIL-101 is attractive as a sorbent for solid-phase extraction of pollutants in aqueous solution due to its high surface area, large pores, accessible coordinative unsaturated sites, and excellent chemical and solvent stability. In situ magnetization of MIL-101 microcrystals as well as magnetic solid-phase extraction of PAHs was achieved simultaneously by simply mixing MIL-101 and silica-coated Fe(3)O(4) microparticles in a sample solution under sonication. Such MOF-based magnetic solid-phase extraction in combination with high-performance liquid chromatography gave the detection limits of 2.8-27.2 ng L(-1) and quantitation limits of 6.3-87.7 ng L(-1) for the PAHs. The relative standard deviations for intra- and inter-day analyses were in the range of 3.1-8.7% and 6.1-8.5%, respectively. The results showed that hydrophobic and π-π interactions between the PAHs and the framework terephthalic acid molecules, and the π-complexation between PAHs and the Lewis acid sites in the pores of MIL-101 play a significant role in the adsorption of PAHs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
From fundamentals to applications: a toolbox for robust and multifunctional MOF materials
Kirchon, A., Feng, L., Drake, H. F., Joseph, E. A., & Zhou, H.-C. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00688a · Cited by 1,448
MOF positioning technology and device fabrication
Falcaro, P., Ricco, R., Doherty, C. M., Liang, K., Hill, A. J., & Styles, M. J. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00089g · Cited by 710
Nanocatalysts and other nanomaterials for water remediation from organic pollutants
Lu, F., & Astruc, D. (2020) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213180 · Cited by 682
Modern trends in solid phase extraction: New sorbent media
Płotka-Wasylka, J., Szczepańska, N., de la Guardia, M., & Namieśnik, J. (2016) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2015.10.010 · Cited by 608
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Food Safety
Wang, P.-L., Xie, L.-H., Joseph, E. A., Li, J.-R., Su, X.-O., & Zhou, H.-C. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00257 · Cited by 533
Metadata
- Authors
- Huo, S.-H., & Yan, X.-P.
- Venue
- The Analyst
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 3445
- ISSN
- 0003-2654 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5528
- OpenAlex
- W2127005699
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Facile magnetization of metal–organic framework MIL-101 for magnetic solid-phase extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in environmental water samples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2an35429b
- The paper
- Huo, S.-H., & Yan, X.-P. (2012). Facile magnetization of metal–organic framework MIL-101 for magnetic solid-phase extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in environmental water samples. The Analyst. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2an35429b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.