The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparing reduced partial charge models with polarizable simulations of ionic liquids
Open accessAbstract
Molecular ionic liquids are typically characterized by strong electrostatic interactions resulting in a charge ordering and retardation of their translational and rotational behaviour. Unfortunately, this effect is often overestimated in classical molecular dynamics simulations. This can be circumvented in a twofold way: the easiest way is to reduce the partial charges of the ions to sub-integer values of ±0.7-0.9 e. The more realistic model is to include polarizable forces, e.g. Drude-oscillators, but it comes along with an increasing computational effort. On the other hand, charge-scaled models are claimed to take an average polarizability into account. But do both models have the same impact on structure and dynamics of molecular ionic liquids? In the present study several molecular dynamics simulations of 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate are performed with different levels of polarization as well as with varying charge scaling factors of 0.74 to 0.90. The analysis of the structural and dynamical results are performed in different levels: from the atomic point of view over the molecular level to collective properties determined by the complete sample.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Revisiting OPLS Force Field Parameters for Ionic Liquid Simulations
Doherty, B., Zhong, X., Gathiaka, S., Li, B., & Acevedo, O. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00520 · Cited by 594
Shah, D., & Mjalli, F. S. (2014) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c4cp02600d · Cited by 383
Microscopic Simulations of Electrochemical Double-Layer Capacitors
Jeanmairet, G., Rotenberg, B., & Salanne, M. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00925 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Schröder, C.
- Venue
- Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3089
- ISSN
- 1463-9076 (ISSN-L)
- 1463-9084
- OpenAlex
- W2039786651
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing reduced partial charge models with polarizable simulations of ionic liquids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2cp23329k
- The paper
- Schröder, C. (2012). Comparing reduced partial charge models with polarizable simulations of ionic liquids. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cp23329k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.