The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular recognition: from solution science to nano/materials technology
Abstract
In the 25 years since its Nobel Prize in chemistry, supramolecular chemistry based on molecular recognition has been paid much attention in scientific and technological fields. Nanotechnology and the related areas seek breakthrough methods of nanofabrication based on rational organization through assembly of constituent molecules. Advanced biochemistry, medical applications, and environmental and energy technologies also depend on the importance of specific interactions between molecules. In those current fields, molecular recognition is now being re-evaluated. In this review, we re-examine current trends in molecular recognition from the viewpoint of the surrounding media, that is (i) the solution phase for development of basic science and molecular design advances; (ii) at nano/materials interfaces for emerging technologies and applications. The first section of this review includes molecular recognition frontiers, receptor design based on combinatorial approaches, organic capsule receptors, metallo-capsule receptors, helical receptors, dendrimer receptors, and the future design of receptor architectures. The following section summarizes topics related to molecular recognition at interfaces including fundamentals of molecular recognition, sensing and detection, structure formation, molecular machines, molecular recognition involving polymers and related materials, and molecular recognition processes in nanostructured materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Design and self-assembly of two-dimensional DNA crystals
Winfree, E., Liu, F., Wenzler, L. A., & Seeman, N. C. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/28998 · Cited by 2,857
Graphene-based semiconductor photocatalysts
Xiang, Q., Yu, J., & Jaroniec, M. (2012) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c1cs15172j · Cited by 2,730
Cited by
Layer-by-layer Nanoarchitectonics: Invention, Innovation, and Evolution
Ariga, K., Yamauchi, Y., Rydzek, G., Ji, Q., Yonamine, Y., Wu, K. C.-W., & Hill, J. P. (2014) · Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1246/cl.130987 · Cited by 850
Self-citationAriga, K., Yamauchi, Y., Mori, T., & Hill, J. P. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201302283 · Cited by 493
Self-citationSelf-assembly as a key player for materials nanoarchitectonics
Ariga, K., Nishikawa, M., Mori, T., Takeya, J., Shrestha, L. K., & Hill, J. P. (2019) · Science and Technology of Advanced Materials · doi:10.1080/14686996.2018.1553108 · Cited by 445
Self-citationEnzyme nanoarchitectonics: organization and device application
Ariga, K., Ji, Q., Mori, T., Naito, M., Yamauchi, Y., Abe, H., & Hill, J. P. (2013) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs35475f · Cited by 397
Self-citationAmphiphile nanoarchitectonics: from basic physical chemistry to advanced applications
Ramanathan, M., Shrestha, L. K., Mori, T., Ji, Q., Hill, J. P., & Ariga, K. (2013) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c3cp50620g · Cited by 353
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ariga, K., Ito, H., Hill, J. P., & Tsukube, H.
- Venue
- Chemical Society Reviews
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 5800
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W1983899755
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.