The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crystalline silicon photovoltaics: a cost analysis framework for determining technology pathways to reach baseload electricity costs
Abstract
Crystalline silicon (c-Si) photovoltaics are robust, manufacturable, and Earth-abundant. However, barriers exist for c-Si modules to reach US$0.50–0.75/Wp fabrication costs necessary for subsidy-free utility-scale adoption. We evaluate the potential of c-Si photovoltaics to reach this goal by developing a bottom-up cost model for c-Si wafer, cell, and module manufacturing; performing a sensitivity analysis to determine research domains that provide the greatest impact on cost; and evaluating the cost-reduction potential of line-of-sight manufacturing innovation and scale, as well as advanced technology innovation. We identify research domains with large cost reduction potential, including improving efficiencies, improving silicon utilization, and streamlining manufacturing processes and equipment, and briefly review ongoing research and development activities that impact these research domains. We conclude that multiple technology pathways exist to enable US$0.50/Wp module manufacturing in the United States with silicon absorbers. More broadly, this work presents a user-targeted research and development framework that prioritizes research needs based on market impact.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2011) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.35 · Cited by 3,894
Cited by
Brandt, R. E., Stevanović, V., Ginley, D. S., & Buonassisi, T. (2015) · MRS Communications · doi:10.1557/mrc.2015.26 · Cited by 817
Self-citationThe case for organic photovoltaics
Darling, S. B., & You, F. (2013) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c3ra42989j · Cited by 508
Material and manufacturing cost considerations for thermoelectrics
LeBlanc, S., Yee, S. K., Scullin, M. L., Dames, C., & Goodson, K. E. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.030 · Cited by 503
Evaluating the causes of cost reduction in photovoltaic modules
Kavlak, G., McNerney, J., & Trancik, J. E. (2018) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.015 · Cited by 451
A perspective on the production of dye-sensitized solar modules
Fakharuddin, A., Jose, R., Brown, T. M., Fabregat-Santiago, F., & Bisquert, J. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c4ee01724b · Cited by 447
Solar Fuels and Solar Chemicals Industry
Nocera, D. G. (2017) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00615 · Cited by 438
Organic–inorganic halide perovskite/crystalline silicon four-terminal tandem solar cells
Löper, P., Moon, S.-J., Martín de Nicolas, S., Niesen, B., Ledinsky, M., Nicolay, S., Bailat, J., Yum, J.-H., De Wolf, S., & Ballif, C. (2015) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c4cp03788j · Cited by 367
Sustainability perspectives- a review for solar photovoltaic trends and growth opportunities
Choudhary, P., & Srivastava, R. K. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.107 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Powell, D. M., Winkler, M. T., Choi, H. J., Simmons, C. B., Needleman, D. B., & Buonassisi, T.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 5874
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2070603801
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 30.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.