The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Second generation ‘nanohybrid supercapacitor’: Evolution of capacitive energy storage devices
Abstract
Nanoscience and nanotechnology can provide tremendous benefits to electrochemical energy storage devices, such as batteries and supercapacitors, by combining new nanoscale properties to realize enhanced energy and power capabilities. A number of published reports on hybrid systems are systematically reviewed in this perspective. Several potential strategies to enhance the energy density above that of generation-I electric double layer capacitors (EDLC: activated carbon/activated carbon) are discussed and some fundamental issues and future directions are identified. We suggest a new hybrid supercapacitor system that is able to meet the energy and power demands for a variety of applications, ranging from microelectronic devices to electrical vehicles, which presents itself as a breakthrough improvement. Two practical hybrid supercapacitor systems, namely, a lithium-ion capacitor (LIC: graphite/activated carbon) and a nanohybrid capacitor (NHC: (nc-Li4Ti5O12/CNF composite)/activated carbon), are featured and compared. The proposed NHC can pave the way toward generation-II supercapacitor systems by taking advantage of a novel, high quality, high efficiency and inexpensive nanomaterial preparation procedure. With such a breakthrough in nanofabrication–nanohybridization technology, the NHC, which utilizes an ultrafast nano-crystalline Li4Ti5O12, is considered to be an alternative for conventional generation-I EDLCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Efficient storage mechanisms for building better supercapacitors
Salanne, M., Rotenberg, B., Naoi, K., Kaneko, K., Taberna, P.-L., Grey, C. P., Dunn, B., & Simon, P. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.70 · Cited by 2,181
Self-citationAchieving high energy density and high power density with pseudocapacitive materials
Choi, C., Ashby, D. S., Butts, D. M., DeBlock, R. H., Wei, Q., Lau, J., & Dunn, B. (2019) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0142-z · Cited by 1,964
Battery‐Supercapacitor Hybrid Devices: Recent Progress and Future Prospects
Zuo, W., Li, R., Zhou, C., Li, Y., Xia, J., & Liu, J. (2017) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201600539 · Cited by 1,637
Electrolyte selection for supercapacitive devices: a critical review
Pal, B., Yang, S., Ramesh, S., Thangadurai, V., & Jose, R. (2019) · Nanoscale Advances · doi:10.1039/c9na00374f · Cited by 1,317
Peanut shell hybrid sodium ion capacitor with extreme energy–power rivals lithium ion capacitors
Ding, J., Wang, H., Li, Z., Cui, K., Karpuzov, D., Tan, X., Kohandehghan, A., & Mitlin, D. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee02986k · Cited by 818
Metadata
- Authors
- Naoi, K., Ishimoto, S., Miyamoto, J.-I., & Naoi, W.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 9363
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W1995151712
- Cited by
- 728
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Second generation ‘nanohybrid supercapacitor’: Evolution of capacitive energy storage devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2ee21675b
- The paper
- Naoi, K., Ishimoto, S., Miyamoto, J.-I., & Naoi, W. (2012). Second generation ‘nanohybrid supercapacitor’: Evolution of capacitive energy storage devices. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee21675b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.