The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Top ten fundamental challenges of biomass pyrolysis for biofuels
Abstract
Pyrolytic biofuels have technical advantages over conventional biological conversion processes since the entire plant can be used as the feedstock (rather than only simple sugars) and the conversion process occurs in only a few seconds (rather than hours or days). Despite decades of study, the fundamental science of biomass pyrolysis is still lacking and detailed models capable of describing the chemistry and transport in real-world reactors is unavailable. Developing these descriptions is a challenge because of the complexity of feedstocks and the multiphase nature of the conversion process. Here, we identify ten fundamental research challenges that, if overcome, would facilitate commercialization of pyrolytic biofuels. In particular, developing fundamental descriptions for condensed-phase pyrolysis chemistry (i.e., elementary reaction mechanisms) are needed since they would allow for accurate process optimization as well as feedstock flexibility, both of which are critical to any modern high-throughput process. Despite the benefits to pyrolysis commercialization, detailed chemical mechanisms are not available today, even for major products such as levoglucosan and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF). Additionally, accurate estimates for heat and mass transfer parameters (e.g., thermal conductivity, diffusivity) are lacking despite the fact that biomass conversion in commercial pyrolysis reactors is controlled by transport. Finally, we examine methods for improving pyrolysis particle models, which connect fundamental chemical and transport descriptions to real-world pyrolysis reactors. Each of the ten challenges is presented with a brief review of relevant literature followed by future directions which can ultimately lead to technological breakthroughs that would facilitate commercialization of pyrolytic biofuels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-oil: A Critical Review
Mohan, D., Pittman, C. U., & Steele, P. H. (2006) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef0502397 · Cited by 5,663
Modeling chemical and physical processes of wood and biomass pyrolysis
DIBLASI, C. (2008) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2006.12.001 · Cited by 1,752
Influence of inorganic salts on the primary pyrolysis products of cellulose
Patwardhan, P. R., Satrio, J. A., Brown, R. C., & Shanks, B. H. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.112 · Cited by 799
Cited by
Carpenter, D., Westover, T. L., Czernik, S., & Jablonski, W. (2014) · Green Chem. · doi:10.1039/c3gc41631c · Cited by 686
Biomass-based chemical looping technologies: the good, the bad and the future
Zhao, X., Zhou, H., Sikarwar, V. S., Zhao, M., Park, A.-H. A., Fennell, P. S., Shen, L., & Fan, L.-S. (2017) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c6ee03718f · Cited by 558
Leng, E., Guo, Y., Chen, J., Liu, S., E, J., & Xue, Y. (2022) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122102 · Cited by 286
A review on the pyrolysis of woody biomass to bio-oil: Focus on kinetic models
Papari, S., & Hawboldt, K. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.191 · Cited by 270
Perkins, G., Bhaskar, T., & Konarova, M. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.048 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Mettler, M. S., Vlachos, D. G., & Dauenhauer, P. J.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 7797
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2168187302
- Cited by
- 576
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Top ten fundamental challenges of biomass pyrolysis for biofuels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2ee21679e
- The paper
- Mettler, M. S., Vlachos, D. G., & Dauenhauer, P. J. (2012). Top ten fundamental challenges of biomass pyrolysis for biofuels. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee21679e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.