The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feasibility of zeolitic imidazolate framework membranes for clean energy applications
Abstract
Gas separation technologies for carbon-free hydrogen and clean gaseous fuel production must efficiently perform the following separations: (1) H2/CO2 (and H2/N2) for pre-combustion coal gasification, (2) CO2/N2 for post-combustion of coal, (3) CO2/CH4 for natural gas sweetening and biofuel purification, and (4) O2/N2 for oxy-combustion of coal. By utilizing a molecular simulation approach, Monte Carlo procedures, free volume analysis, and continuum modeling, we predict the intrinsic gas permeability and separation properties of several new Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks (ZIFs), a family of the Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs). The well defined pore sizes in conjunction with high surface areas make ZIFs prime candidates for molecular sieving. In this work, our calculated intrinsic properties are compared with current experimental results where ZIFs are either grown in dense layers to form pure inorganic membranes on porous supports or dispersed within a polymer phase to form mixed matrix membranes. Consequently, this paper assesses current membrane development according to industrial feasibility targets and highlights the achievable superior separation results for ideal membrane configurations. For example, ZIF-11 is discovered to be capable of sieving H2 from all of its larger gas counterparts at a remarkable H2/CO2 selectivity of 262 and H2 permeability of 5830 Barrer, well within the target area for efficient hydrogen production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in CO2 capture technology—The U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program
Figueroa, J. D., Fout, T., Plasynski, S., McIlvried, H., & Srivastava, R. D. (2008) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/s1750-5836(07)00094-1 · Cited by 2,281
Carbon capture and storage: how green can black be
Haszeldine, R. S. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172246 · Cited by 2,021
Cited by
Advanced Porous Materials in Mixed Matrix Membranes
Cheng, Y., Ying, Y., Japip, S., Jiang, S., Chung, T., Zhang, S., & Zhao, D. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201802401 · Cited by 448
Review of pre-combustion capture and ionic liquid in carbon capture and storage
Theo, W. L., Lim, J. S., Hashim, H., Mustaffa, A. A., & Ho, W. S. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.103 · Cited by 396
Chang, X., Wang, Z., Quan, S., Xu, Y., Jiang, Z., & Shao, L. (2014) · Applied Surface Science · doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.07.202 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Thornton, A. W., Dubbeldam, D., Liu, M. S., Ladewig, B. P., Hill, A. J., & Hill, M. R.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 7637
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2113254436
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 33.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feasibility of zeolitic imidazolate framework membranes for clean energy applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2ee21743k
- The paper
- Thornton, A. W., Dubbeldam, D., Liu, M. S., Ladewig, B. P., Hill, A. J., & Hill, M. R. (2012). Feasibility of zeolitic imidazolate framework membranes for clean energy applications. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee21743k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.