The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the large voltage range of carbon/carbon supercapacitors in aqueous lithium sulfate electrolyte
Abstract
This study investigates the large voltage range of symmetric carbon/carbon capacitors in environmentally friendly aqueous lithium sulfate electrolyte. A high over-potential related to the hydrogen sorption mechanism at the negative electrode contributes usefully to enhance the operating voltage up to 1.9 V with an excellent stability during 10 000 charge/discharge cycles. Such a voltage value is two times higher than the values generally demonstrated with symmetric carbon/carbon capacitors in conventional aqueous media, while avoiding the disadvantages of the corrosive properties of acidic and basic electrolytes. Temperature programmed desorption analysis of the electrodes after long-term cycling gives the evidence that the maximum voltage is essentially limited by an irreversible electro-oxidation process at the positive electrode. If the potential of the positive electrode goes beyond a given value during cell operation, a massive electro-oxidation of carbon leads to a further deleterious increase of the maximum potential of the electrode and an increase of electrode resistance resulting in a decrease of capacitance. Inconvenience can be sidestepped by performing a controlled chemical oxidation of the carbon surface using hydrogen peroxide. As a consequence, the maximum potential of the electrode remains stable during operation of the cell at 1.9 V, and the system can be charged/discharged during 10 000 cycles with very moderate loss of capacitance or increase of resistance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Air as the renewable carbon source of the future: an overview of CO2 capture from the atmosphere
Goeppert, A., Czaun, M., Surya Prakash, G. K., & Olah, G. A. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21586a · Cited by 724
Cited by
Carbons and Electrolytes for Advanced Supercapacitors
Béguin, F., Presser, V., Balducci, A., & Frackowiak, E. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201304137 · Cited by 2,686
Self-citationSupercapacitors Performance Evaluation
Zhang, S., & Pan, N. (2015) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201401401 · Cited by 1,529
Laheäär, A., Przygocki, P., Abbas, Q., & Béguin, F. (2015) · Electrochemistry Communications · doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2015.07.022 · Cited by 720
Self-citationCarbon-Based Fibers for Advanced Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices
Chen, S., Qiu, L., & Cheng, H.-M. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00466 · Cited by 555
Chun, S.-E., Evanko, B., Wang, X., Vonlanthen, D., Ji, X., Stucky, G. D., & Boettcher, S. W. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8818 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, Q., Demarconnay, L., Raymundo-Piñero, E., & Béguin, F.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 9611
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2076115285
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.