The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overall photocatalytic water splitting with NiOx–SrTiO3 – a revised mechanism
Abstract
NiOx (0 < x < 1) modified SrTiO3 (STO) is one of the best studied photocatalysts for overall water splitting under UV light. The established mechanism for this and many other NiOx containing catalysts assumes water oxidation to occur at the early transition metal oxide and water reduction at NiOx. Here we show that NiOx–STO is more likely a three component Ni–STO–NiO catalyst, in which STO absorbs the light, Ni reduces protons, and NiO oxidizes water. This interpretation is based on systematic H2/O2 evolution tests of appropriately varied catalyst compositions using oxidized, chemically and photochemically added nickel and NiO nanoparticle cocatalysts. Surface photovoltage (SPV) measurements reveal that Ni(0) serves as an electron trap (site for water reduction) and that NiO serves as a hole trap (site for water oxidation). Electrochemical measurements show that the overpotential for water oxidation correlates with the NiO content, whereas the water reduction overpotential depends on the Ni content. Photodeposition experiments with NiCl2 and H2PtCl6 on NiO–STO show that electrons are available on the STO surface, not on the NiO particles. Based on photoelectrochemistry, both NiO and Ni particles suppress the Fermi level in STO, but the effect of this shift on catalytic activity is not clear. Overall, the results suggest a revised role of NiO in NiOx–STO and in many other nickel-containing water splitting systems, including NiOx–La : KTaO3, and many layered perovskites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computational high-throughput screening of electrocatalytic materials for hydrogen evolution
Greeley, J., Jaramillo, T. F., Bonde, J., Chorkendorff, I., & Nørskov, J. K. (2006) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1752 · Cited by 4,097
Iwashina, K., & Kudo, A. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja2050315 · Cited by 457
Cited by
Transition Metal Disulfides as Noble‐Metal‐Alternative Co‐Catalysts for Solar Hydrogen Production
Chang, K., Hai, X., & Ye, J. (2016) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201502555 · Cited by 346
Yu, H., Xiao, P., Wang, P., & Yu, J. (2016) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.04.028 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Townsend, T. K., Browning, N. D., & Osterloh, F. E.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 9543
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2061577271
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.